From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 19:38:27 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] tmio: let platforms decide upon write-protection
Message-Id: <20100521123827.a8d7a87a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
List-Id: <linux-sh.vger.kernel.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005191815491.3099@axis700.grange>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005191815491.3099@axis700.grange>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Cc: "linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>, Ian Molton <ian@mnementh.co.uk>, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>

On Wed, 19 May 2010 20:35:57 +0200 (CEST)
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> wrote:

> No changes to patches themselves, just re-sending with an ack added.
> 
> Applies on top of the
> 
> "[PATCH 0/10] add DMA support to tmio_mmc, using dmaengine API, use it on SH"
> 
> patch series.
> 

Paul, are you planning on merging the tem patches in the
above-mentioned series for 2.6.35-rc1?