From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mundt Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 07:33:33 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] tmio: let platforms decide upon write-protection availability Message-Id: <20100522073332.GA17814@linux-sh.org> List-Id: References: <20100521123827.a8d7a87a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20100521123827.a8d7a87a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andrew Morton Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski , "linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" , Ian Molton , Samuel Ortiz , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:38:27PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 19 May 2010 20:35:57 +0200 (CEST) > Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > No changes to patches themselves, just re-sending with an ack added. > > > > Applies on top of the > > > > "[PATCH 0/10] add DMA support to tmio_mmc, using dmaengine API, use it on SH" > > > > patch series. > > > > Paul, are you planning on merging the tem patches in the > above-mentioned series for 2.6.35-rc1? > Yes, they'll be in my next round of updates for -rc1. Since I don't have much else, I'll send those out today or tomorrow.