From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh_tmu: compute mult and shift before registration
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 21:45:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100531214535.GF17694@hall.aurel32.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1275296994-12005-1-git-send-email-aurelien@aurel32.net>
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 08:36:54PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 01:19:51PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Magnus Damm a ?crit :
> > > Hm, are you sure the clock is enabled at this point?
> > >
> > > The file include/linux/clk.h says that the clock has to be enabled
> > > before clk_get_rate() is called.
> > >
> >
> > In practice yes, but as you said it seems that theoretically it is not
> > guaranteed, so it may break again in the future.
> >
> It's a bit risky this early on, board code has ultimate control over what
> sort of external oscillator is actually hooked up and promptly kicks a
> rate propagation down the chain from the top down in order to reflect
> those settings (some boards will have variable input clocks where we need
> to test a pin to work out which is actually hooked up).
>
> We've been lucky for the simple cases largely because few boards have
> deviated from the defaults, but that's not behaviour we want to rely on.
> The alternative is tying in a notifier chain, as we do with the serial
> and cpufreq cases.
>
> > It probably means that if the clock is not already started we have to
> > start it, call clk_get_rate() and stop it.
> >
> The clock yes, but not the timer channel. You can simply use a
> clk_enable()/disable() pair around the get_rate and you'll be fine, this
> is what most drivers do when the rate information is needed well before
> there is any intent to keep the block clocked for any lengthy duration.
> This still won't help for the case where the board code kicks down a rate
> change, so that still needs a bit of a think.
>
The current code gives a maximum idle period of 287 seconds, so it is
unlikely that this valued is reached, even with a clock that get
multiplied by 10 or 20. I am not really sure the nohz change has
actually an effect on most clock sources, I guess it has been written
for a very special case. I still wonder why it has been applied in
stable updates.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-31 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-31 9:09 [PATCH] sh_tmu: compute mult and shift before registration Aurelien Jarno
2010-05-31 10:50 ` Magnus Damm
2010-05-31 11:19 ` Aurelien Jarno
2010-05-31 11:36 ` Paul Mundt
2010-05-31 21:45 ` Aurelien Jarno [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100531214535.GF17694@hall.aurel32.net \
--to=aurelien@aurel32.net \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox