public inbox for linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED usage in pcibios_fixup_device_resources()
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 03:05:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100607030504.GC4258@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201006031638.33726.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>

On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 10:04:30AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thursday, June 03, 2010 06:42:53 pm Paul Mundt wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 04:38:32PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > The SH implementation of pcibios_fixup_device_resources() does the
> > > equivalent of pcibios_bus_to_resource() for all the resources of a
> > > device, except that it skips resources with the IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED
> > > flag set.
> > > 
> > > This looks like a bug to me.  IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED means the resource
> > > cannot be moved, not that we should skip pcibios_bus_to_resource().
> > > 
> > > Does anybody know why pcibios_fixup_device_resources() does this check?
> > > 
> > > The only other IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED reference I see in arch/sh is in
> > > gapspci_fixup_resources(), so maybe it has something to do with that?
> > > 
> > gapspci is a very special case, in that it's not really PCI but a bit of
> > mangling logic in a custom ASIC that interfaces an 8139 ethernet device
> > directly on to an ISA-style bus. If you take a look at
> > arch/sh/drivers/pci/fixups-dreamcast.c you can see where the flag is set
> > and the rationale behind it.
> 
> Yes, using IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED in gapspci_fixup_resources() sounds
> reasonable; it's just that it doesn't make sense to test for it in
> pcibios_fixup_device_resources() or pcibios_bus_to_resource().
> 
> > Looking at the code again though it seems like pcibios_bus_to_resource()
> > will not cause any problems, especially given that the io and mem offsets
> > are both cleared to 0 for that controller. I'll kill off the test from
> > pcibios_fixup_device_resources(), I assume this was a remnant from the
> > old pci-auto code which we moved off of some time ago.
> 
> Thanks.  I'll watch for your checkin.  I'm working on some patches
> to move the generic parts of pcibios_fixup_bus() out of the arches
> and into drivers/pci, and that depends on this change.
> 
I've checked in a fix for this now, which I'll send to Linus for -rc3.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-07  3:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-03 22:38 IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED usage in pcibios_fixup_device_resources() Bjorn Helgaas
2010-06-04  0:42 ` Paul Mundt
2010-06-04 16:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-06-07  3:05 ` Paul Mundt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100607030504.GC4258@linux-sh.org \
    --to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox