From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] arm & sh: factorised duplicated clkdev.c
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 10:01:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100901100155.GN8142@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1283253402-3139-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 01:16:42PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/lookup_clkdev.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/lookup_clkdev.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d57f7a6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/lookup_clkdev.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
> +/*
> + * arch/arm/common/clkdev.c
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2008 Russell King.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * Helper for the clk API to assist looking up a struct clk.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __LOOKUP_CLK_DEV__
> +#define __LOOKUP_CLK_DEV__
> +
> +#include <mach/clkdev.h>
> +
> +static __inline__ struct clk_lookup_alloc *arch_kzalloc(size_t size)
No need to use __inline__ here - use inline instead.
> +static __inline__ struct clk_lookup_alloc *arch_kzalloc(size_t size)
Ditto.
> @@ -120,12 +124,12 @@ struct clk_lookup_alloc {
> char con_id[MAX_CON_ID];
> };
>
> -struct clk_lookup *clkdev_alloc(struct clk *clk, const char *con_id,
> - const char *dev_fmt, ...)
> +struct clk_lookup * __init_refok
> +clkdev_alloc(struct clk *clk, const char *con_id, const char *dev_fmt, ...)
This looks like a nasty hack to get around the problem of calling a
boot-time only allocator - but I guess given what sh is doing we don't
have much choice here.
The choice of 'arch_kzalloc' is imho very poor - it potentially could
clash with some other use. Maybe __clkdev_alloc() instead?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-01 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-31 11:16 [RFC] [PATCH] arm & sh: factorised duplicated clkdev.c Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-01 9:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-01 11:13 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-01 23:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02 2:37 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-02 2:42 ` Paul Mundt
2010-09-01 9:51 `
2010-09-01 11:18 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-01 15:01 `
2010-09-01 15:27 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-01 15:40 `
2010-09-01 23:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02 5:46 `
2010-09-02 8:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-01 10:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-09-01 11:12 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-02 12:48 ` [RFC] [PATCH v2] " Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-02 13:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02 13:26 `
2010-09-02 13:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02 13:55 `
2010-09-02 13:39 ` [PATCH V3] " Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-03 10:18 ` Magnus Damm
2010-09-03 10:32 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-03 18:23 `
2010-09-03 18:43 ` [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: Jonathan Nieder
2010-09-03 19:29 ` [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-03 19:33 `
2010-09-03 19:45 ` [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & sh: factoris Andreas Schwab
2010-09-04 0:03 ` [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-04 21:33 ` [bug-patch] Re: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] ar Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-04 21:45 ` [bug-patch] Re: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-04 21:46 ` [bug-patch] Re: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] ar Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-04 22:01 ` [bug-patch] Re: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-04 22:26 ` [bug-patch] Re: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] ar Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-03 19:34 ` [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & sh: factoris Matthieu Moy
2010-09-03 22:58 ` [bug-patch] [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-03 23:32 ` [bug-patch] [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, Jonathan Nieder
2010-09-04 21:57 ` [bug-patch] [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-04 3:21 ` [bug-patch] [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-09 9:53 ` [PATCH V3] arm & sh: factorised duplicated clkdev.c Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-14 7:59 ` Paul Mundt
2010-09-15 5:51 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-10-04 19:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100901100155.GN8142@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).