From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:01:12 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] arm & sh: factorised duplicated clkdev.c Message-Id: <20100901150112.GF11107@pengutronix.de> List-Id: References: <1283253402-3139-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <20100901095121.GA11107@pengutronix.de> <20100901111846.GF22790@game.jcrosoft.org> In-Reply-To: <20100901111846.GF22790@game.jcrosoft.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 01:18:46PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD = wrote: > > > =20 > > > -struct clk_lookup *clkdev_alloc(struct clk *clk, const char *con_id, > > > - const char *dev_fmt, ...) > > > +struct clk_lookup * __init_refok > > Why do you need __init_refok? __init_refok is defined as follows in > > include/linux/init.h: > >=20 > > /* compatibility defines */ > > #define __init_refok __ref > >=20 > > So if really needed better use __ref. Couldn't this be __init? =20 > ok for __ref but __init_refok is more clear IMHO For me it was not, because before your mail I didn't know __init_refok so I had to look it up. > and yes we need it as for early device we may use bootmem as slab allocat= ors > may no be availlable in some case Yes I got that, but it doesn't explain why you need to mark your function as __ref or why you cannot use __init. Best regards Uwe --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |