From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] arm & sh: factorised duplicated clkdev.c
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 02:37:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100902023712.GH22790@game.jcrosoft.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100901231752.GA25860@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 00:17 Thu 02 Sep , Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 01:13:02PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > On 10:12 Wed 01 Sep , Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 01:16:42PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > > factorise some generic infrastructure to assist looking up struct clks
> > > > for the ARM & SH architecture.
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Returns a clock. Note that we first try to use device id on the bus
> > > > + * and clock name. If this fails, we try to use clock name only.
> > > > + */
> > > > struct clk *clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
> > > > {
> > > > const char *dev_id = dev ? dev_name(dev) : NULL;
> > > >
> > > > return clk_get_sys(dev_id, con_id);
> > > > }
> > > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_get);
> > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_get);
> > > >
> > > > void clk_put(struct clk *clk)
> > > > {
> > > > __clk_put(clk);
> > > > }
> > > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_put);
> > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_put);
> > >
> > > Please leave these as-is.
> > ok but on SH it's GPL so it is ok with you Paul too?
>
> If you want to get that pedantic... I created clkdev, and Sascha Hauer
> extended it with some refactoring to create the clk_get_sys() interface.
personnaly It's fine for I
I just get in mind to knon if Paul have a specific reason to put it as GPL
EXPORT_SYMBOL
Best Regards,
J.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-02 2:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-31 11:16 [RFC] [PATCH] arm & sh: factorised duplicated clkdev.c Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-01 9:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-01 11:13 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-01 23:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02 2:37 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [this message]
2010-09-02 2:42 ` Paul Mundt
2010-09-01 9:51 `
2010-09-01 11:18 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-01 15:01 `
2010-09-01 15:27 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-01 15:40 `
2010-09-01 23:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02 5:46 `
2010-09-02 8:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-01 10:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-01 11:12 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-02 12:48 ` [RFC] [PATCH v2] " Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-02 13:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02 13:26 `
2010-09-02 13:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02 13:55 `
2010-09-02 13:39 ` [PATCH V3] " Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-03 10:18 ` Magnus Damm
2010-09-03 10:32 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-03 18:23 `
2010-09-03 18:43 ` [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: Jonathan Nieder
2010-09-03 19:29 ` [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-03 19:33 `
2010-09-03 19:45 ` [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & sh: factoris Andreas Schwab
2010-09-04 0:03 ` [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-04 21:33 ` [bug-patch] Re: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] ar Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-04 21:45 ` [bug-patch] Re: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-04 21:46 ` [bug-patch] Re: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] ar Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-04 22:01 ` [bug-patch] Re: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-04 22:26 ` [bug-patch] Re: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] ar Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-03 19:34 ` [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & sh: factoris Matthieu Moy
2010-09-03 22:58 ` [bug-patch] [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-03 23:32 ` [bug-patch] [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, Jonathan Nieder
2010-09-04 21:57 ` [bug-patch] [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-04 3:21 ` [bug-patch] [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-09 9:53 ` [PATCH V3] arm & sh: factorised duplicated clkdev.c Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-14 7:59 ` Paul Mundt
2010-09-15 5:51 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-10-04 19:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100902023712.GH22790@game.jcrosoft.org \
--to=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).