linux-sh.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH v2] arm & sh: factorised duplicated clkdev.c
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:06:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100902130614.GC26319@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1283431716-21540-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 02:48:36PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/clkdev.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/clkdev.h
> index b56c138..1293780 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/clkdev.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/clkdev.h
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>  /*
> - *  arch/arm/include/asm/clkdev.h
> + *  arch/arm/include/linux/clkdev.h

?

> +/*
> + * Returns a clock. Note that we first try to use device id on the bus
> + * and clock name. If this fails, we try to use clock name only.
> + */

This comment is actually wrong, and conflicts with the commentry against
clk_find(), which describes completely how clocks are found.  Therefore,
this comment should be deleted.

> diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/clkdev.h b/include/linux/clkdev.h
> similarity index 85%
> rename from arch/sh/include/asm/clkdev.h
> rename to include/linux/clkdev.h
> index 5645f35..bd2ec89 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/include/asm/clkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clkdev.h
> @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
>  /*
> - *  arch/sh/include/asm/clkdev.h
> - *
> - * Cloned from arch/arm/include/asm/clkdev.h:
> + *  include/linux/clkdev.h
>   *
>   *  Copyright (C) 2008 Russell King.
>   *
> @@ -11,8 +9,10 @@
>   *
>   * Helper for the clk API to assist looking up a struct clk.
>   */
> -#ifndef __ASM_CLKDEV_H
> -#define __ASM_CLKDEV_H
> +#ifndef __CLKDEV_H
> +#define __CLKDEV_H
> +
> +#include <asm/clkdev.h>
>  
>  struct clk;
>  

This should really be a clone of the ARM version of clkdev.h - the sh
version misses the predeclaration of 'struct device' which is required
for the function prototypes in this file.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-02 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-31 11:16 [RFC] [PATCH] arm & sh: factorised duplicated clkdev.c Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-01  9:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-01 11:13   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-01 23:17     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02  2:37       ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-02  2:42         ` Paul Mundt
2010-09-01  9:51 ` 
2010-09-01 11:18   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-01 15:01     ` 
2010-09-01 15:27       ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-01 15:40         ` 
2010-09-01 23:18       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02  5:46         ` 
2010-09-02  8:45           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-01 10:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-01 11:12   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-02 12:48 ` [RFC] [PATCH v2] " Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-02 13:06   ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-09-02 13:26   ` 
2010-09-02 13:47     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02 13:55       ` 
2010-09-02 13:39   ` [PATCH V3] " Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-03 10:18     ` Magnus Damm
2010-09-03 10:32     ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-03 18:23     ` 
2010-09-03 18:43       ` [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: Jonathan Nieder
2010-09-03 19:29         ` [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-03 19:33           ` 
2010-09-03 19:45             ` [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & sh: factoris Andreas Schwab
2010-09-04  0:03             ` [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-04 21:33               ` [bug-patch] Re: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] ar Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-04 21:45                 ` [bug-patch] Re: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-04 21:46                   ` [bug-patch] Re: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] ar Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-04 22:01                     ` [bug-patch] Re: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-04 22:26                       ` [bug-patch] Re: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] ar Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-03 19:34           ` [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & sh: factoris Matthieu Moy
2010-09-03 22:58         ` [bug-patch] [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-03 23:32           ` [bug-patch] [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, Jonathan Nieder
2010-09-04 21:57             ` [bug-patch] [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-04  3:21           ` [bug-patch] [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-09  9:53     ` [PATCH V3] arm & sh: factorised duplicated clkdev.c Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-14  7:59       ` Paul Mundt
2010-09-15  5:51         ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-10-04 19:46       ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100902130614.GC26319@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).