From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
git@vger.kernel.org, bug-patch@gnu.org
Subject: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re:
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:43:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100903184351.GC2341@burratino> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100903182323.GA17152@pengutronix.de>
(+cc: bug-patch)
Hi,
Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 07:18:43PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
>> Using --dry-run is fine, but omitting dry-run gives me:
>>
>> ...
>> patching file arch/arm/common/clkdev.c
>> patching file arch/sh/include/asm/clkdev.h
>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 11.
>> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>> arch/sh/include/asm/clkdev.h.rej
>>
>> I guess this is caused by the last "renaming" hunk, see below.
Yep, I can reproduce this. Patch applies with "git apply",
"patch --dry-run -p1" accepts it, "patch -p1" fails.
$ patch --version | head -1
GNU patch 2.6.1.85-423d
$ cd ~/src/linux-2.6
$ git checkout 2bfc96a12
$ git clean -fd
$ wget http://download.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel/8747/8748
$ patch -p1 --quiet --dry-run <8748
$ echo $?
0
$ patch -p1 --quiet <8748
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/clkdev.h.rej
$ echo $?
1
Andreas: ideas?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-03 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-31 11:16 [RFC] [PATCH] arm & sh: factorised duplicated clkdev.c Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-01 9:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-01 11:13 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-01 23:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02 2:37 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-02 2:42 ` Paul Mundt
2010-09-01 9:51 `
2010-09-01 11:18 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-01 15:01 `
2010-09-01 15:27 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-01 15:40 `
2010-09-01 23:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02 5:46 `
2010-09-02 8:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-01 10:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-01 11:12 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-02 12:48 ` [RFC] [PATCH v2] " Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-02 13:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02 13:26 `
2010-09-02 13:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-02 13:55 `
2010-09-02 13:39 ` [PATCH V3] " Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-03 10:18 ` Magnus Damm
2010-09-03 10:32 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-03 18:23 `
2010-09-03 18:43 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2010-09-03 19:29 ` [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-03 19:33 `
2010-09-03 19:45 ` [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & sh: factoris Andreas Schwab
2010-09-04 0:03 ` [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-04 21:33 ` [bug-patch] Re: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] ar Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-04 21:45 ` [bug-patch] Re: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-04 21:46 ` [bug-patch] Re: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] ar Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-04 22:01 ` [bug-patch] Re: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-04 22:26 ` [bug-patch] Re: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] ar Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-03 19:34 ` [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & sh: factoris Matthieu Moy
2010-09-03 22:58 ` [bug-patch] [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-03 23:32 ` [bug-patch] [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, Jonathan Nieder
2010-09-04 21:57 ` [bug-patch] [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-04 3:21 ` [bug-patch] [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-09 9:53 ` [PATCH V3] arm & sh: factorised duplicated clkdev.c Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-14 7:59 ` Paul Mundt
2010-09-15 5:51 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-10-04 19:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100903184351.GC2341@burratino \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=bug-patch@gnu.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).