From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mundt Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:45:14 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from MMC support for SuperH Mobile ARM Message-Id: <20110110154514.GC3760@linux-sh.org> List-Id: References: <20110109124928.GC25591@verge.net.au> <1294589548.8897.1.camel@rojo> <20110109225042.GB29257@verge.net.au> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:10:19AM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:50:42 +0900, Simon Horman > wrote: > >>> Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/Makefile | 8 + > >>> Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/vrl4.c | 169 > >>+++++++++++++++++++++ > >>How about putting those two into "tools" (in particular "tools/arm") > >>instead of "Documentation"? > >>Just a thought... ;-) > > > >Thats fine by me except that tools/arm doesn't exist yet. > >It would be good to get some consensus before creating it. > > I think there is consensus regarding "tools" as a place for user-space > tools - eg. perf tools used to live in "Documentation/..." and then were > moved to "tools/perf". > > Now, whether your stuff should be in "tools/SH-Mobile" or > "tools/arm/SH-Mobile", I have no opinion ;-) > I agree that this is a worthwhile direction to move to, but we're a long way from a consensus. x86 has traditionally littered scripts/ and others have sunk to arch//tools hostprogs abuse and so forth. perf is a bit of a special case in that it's fairly architecture agnostic.