From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mundt Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:12:28 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc, sh: Move MMCIF_PROGRESS_* into sh_mmcif.h Message-Id: <20110113211228.GB20418@linux-sh.org> List-Id: References: <20110110230549.GA20886@verge.net.au> In-Reply-To: <20110110230549.GA20886@verge.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:51:05PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:51:50AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:07:51AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > > > Blast. I thought I had all of the common/mmcif stuff rolled in via > > > rmobile/mmcif, but it seems this one slipped by. I'll make sure it gets > > > merged this time around. > > > > > > Optionally you can just push it out without the enums resolved also, the > > > build target will just fail until the other patch catches up. > > > > Ok, I guess that sounds reasonable. Its not like many people/anyone will have > > the config option enabled while the merge is shaking itself out. > > Submitted to Russell's patch tracker > http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?idf17/1 Everything has been pulled by Linus now, so it's just this patch in the patch tracker that should be outstanding. You may wish to double check to make sure I got it all this time around :-)