From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:16:12 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Common struct clk implementation, v14 Message-Id: <20110314101612.GD28960@pengutronix.de> List-Id: References: <201102011711.31258.jeremy.kerr@canonical.com> <1299134429.100626.661279191478.0.gpush@pororo> In-Reply-To: <1299134429.100626.661279191478.0.gpush@pororo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 02:40:29PM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > These patches are an attempt to allow platforms to share clock code. At > present, the definitions of 'struct clk' are local to platform code, > which makes allocating and initialising cross-platform clock sources > difficult, and makes it impossible to compile a single image containing > support for two ARM platforms with different struct clks. >=20 > The three patches are for the architecture-independent kernel code, > introducing the common clk infrastructure. The changelog for the first > patch includes details about the new clock definitions. >=20 > Many thanks to the following for their input: > * Benjamin Herrenschmidt > * Ben Dooks > * Baruch Siach > * Russell King > * Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig > * Lorenzo Pieralisi > * Vincent Guittot > * Sascha Hauer > * Ryan Mallon > * Colin Cross > * Jassi Brar > * Saravana Kannan Tested-by: Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig who is responsible to take this patch? Russell? Best regards Uwe --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |