From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Ira W. Snyder" Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 15:40:47 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/02] virtio: Virtio platform driver Message-Id: <20110316154047.GB21758@ovro.caltech.edu> List-Id: References: <20110310070541.27327.52089.sendpatchset@t400s> <87d3lriv7e.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Magnus Damm Cc: Rusty Russell , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, mst@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 02:17:15PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > Hi Rusty, > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Rusty Russell wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:05:41 +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > >> virtio: Virtio platform driver > >> > >> [PATCH 01/02] virtio: Break out lguest virtio code to virtio_lguest.c > >> [PATCH 02/02] virtio: Add virtio platform driver > > > > I have no problem with these patches, but it's just churn until we see > > your actual drivers. > > Well, actually this platform driver is used together with already > existing drivers, so there are no new virtio drivers to wait for. > > The drivers that have been tested are so far: > > CONFIG_VIRTIO_CONSOLE=y > CONFIG_VIRTIO_NET=y > > At this point there are four different pieces of code working together > > 1) Virtio platform driver patches (for guest) > 2) SH4AL-DSP guest kernel patch > 3) ARM UIO driver patches (for host) > 4) User space backing code for ARM based on lguest.c > > These patches in this mail thread are 1), and I decided to brush up > that portion and submit upstream because it's the part that is easiest > to break out. I intend to post the rest bit by bit over time, but if > someone is interested then I can post everything at once too. > I'm very interested in the full series of patches. I want to do something similar to talk between two Linux kernels (x86 and PowerPC) connected by a PCI bus. Thanks, Ira > > The S/390 devs might be interested, as their bus is very similar too... > > The lguest device code is very similar as well, perhaps it's worth > refactoring that a bit to build on top of the platform driver. Not > sure if you see that as a move in the right direction though. > > Thanks for your feedback! > > / magnus > _______________________________________________ > Virtualization mailing list > Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization