From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
Ian Molton <ian@mnementh.co.uk>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] mmc: split the tmio driver into several modules
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:54:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110323145453.GA12106@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110322220623.GJ2423@verge.net.au>
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 07:06:24AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> By 1-3 I was referring to the first three patches of
> [PATCH 0/4] [rfc v3] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from eSD support for SuperH Mobile ARM
>
> That is:
> [PATCH 1/4] mmc: tmio_mmc: Move some defines into a shared header
> [PATCH 2/4] mmc, ARM: Rename SuperH Mobile ARM zboot helpers
> [PATCH 3/4] mmc: Add MMC_PROGRESS_*
>
> And by patch 4 I was referring to
> [PATCH 4/4 v5] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from eSD support for SuperH Mobile
>
> I apologise for that being as clear as mud.
>
Ok, that makes a bit more sense, thanks for clearing it up.
> Magnus raised a build issue with the series since my previous email.
> I will investigate that and reply to him ASAP. Its probably best
> to hold all the patches until then.
>
It looks like 1/4 is going to have to go through the MMC tree, and will
have to layer on top of Guennadi's current patch stack. He's done a good
job of summarizing the outstanding bits, so it should be trivial to build
on top of that.
Once 1/4 is merged I can easily merge 2 and 3/4 at pretty much any time
during the -rc window, although I'd prefer to have it sorted out by -rc2
or -rc3 at the latest. This will just leave 4/4 for rmk's patch tracker
and its respective scheduling.
For now I'll punt the series from patchwork and await a resend with 1/4
rebased in such a way that it can trivially be picked up by the MMC tree.
> With regards to
> [PATCH 2/6] sh: ecovec: use the CONFIG_MMC_TMIO symbols instead of MFD
> it looks like Magnus raised a few issues and Guennadi is going to repost
> the patch. But I could be wrong.
>
Yes, already dealt with separately.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-23 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-11 7:51 [PATCH 0/6] mmc: split the tmio driver into several modules Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-03-11 7:51 ` [PATCH 1/6] mmc: tmio: split core functionality, DMA and MFD glue Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-03-12 16:05 ` Magnus Damm
2011-03-12 22:48 ` [PATCH 1/6] mmc: tmio: split core functionality, DMA and MFD Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-03-13 3:57 ` [PATCH 1/6] mmc: tmio: split core functionality, DMA and MFD glue Magnus Damm
2011-03-13 22:51 ` [PATCH 1/6] mmc: tmio: split core functionality, DMA and MFD Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-03-15 9:01 ` [PATCH 1/6] mmc: tmio: split core functionality, DMA and MFD glue Magnus Damm
2011-03-16 11:09 ` Ian Molton
2011-03-16 12:37 ` Magnus Damm
2011-03-21 11:19 ` [PATCH 1/6] mmc: tmio: split core functionality, DMA and MFD Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-03-11 7:52 ` [PATCH 2/6] sh: ecovec: use the CONFIG_MMC_TMIO symbols instead of Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-03-12 16:18 ` [PATCH 2/6] sh: ecovec: use the CONFIG_MMC_TMIO symbols instead Magnus Damm
2011-03-12 23:00 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-03-11 7:52 ` [PATCH 3/6] mmc: tmio: convert the SDHI MMC driver from MFD to a Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-03-13 4:14 ` Magnus Damm
2011-03-14 8:01 ` [PATCH 3/6] mmc: tmio: convert the SDHI MMC driver from MFD to Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-03-15 9:09 ` [PATCH 3/6] mmc: tmio: convert the SDHI MMC driver from MFD to a Magnus Damm
2011-03-11 7:52 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: mach-shmobile: convert boards to use Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-03-11 7:52 ` [PATCH 5/6] sh: convert boards to use linux/mmc/sh_mobile_sdhi.h Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-03-11 7:52 ` [PATCH 6/6] mfd: remove now redundant sh_mobile_sdhi.h header Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-03-15 21:25 ` [PATCH 0/6] mmc: split the tmio driver into several modules Ian Molton
2011-03-21 11:38 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-03-22 5:31 ` Simon Horman
2011-03-22 12:28 ` Paul Mundt
2011-03-22 22:06 ` Simon Horman
2011-03-23 14:54 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2011-03-23 22:42 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110323145453.GA12106@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=ian@mnementh.co.uk \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).