Re: [PATCH 0/6] mmc: split the tmio driver into several modules

[Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>]

On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:54:53PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 07:06:24AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > By 1-3 I was referring to the first three patches of
> > [PATCH 0/4] [rfc v3] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from eSD support for SuperH Mobile ARM
> > 
> > That is:
> > [PATCH 1/4] mmc: tmio_mmc: Move some defines into a shared header
> > [PATCH 2/4] mmc, ARM: Rename SuperH Mobile ARM zboot helpers
> > [PATCH 3/4] mmc: Add MMC_PROGRESS_*
> > 
> > And by patch 4 I was referring to
> > [PATCH 4/4 v5] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from eSD support for SuperH Mobile
> > 
> > I apologise for that being as clear as mud.
> > 
> Ok, that makes a bit more sense, thanks for clearing it up.
> 
> > Magnus raised a build issue with the series since my previous email.
> > I will investigate that and reply to him ASAP. Its probably best
> > to hold all the patches until then.
> > 
> It looks like 1/4 is going to have to go through the MMC tree, and will
> have to layer on top of Guennadi's current patch stack. He's done a good
> job of summarizing the outstanding bits, so it should be trivial to build
> on top of that.
> 
> Once 1/4 is merged I can easily merge 2 and 3/4 at pretty much any time
> during the -rc window, although I'd prefer to have it sorted out by -rc2
> or -rc3 at the latest. This will just leave 4/4 for rmk's patch tracker
> and its respective scheduling.
> 
> For now I'll punt the series from patchwork and await a resend with 1/4
> rebased in such a way that it can trivially be picked up by the MMC tree.

Understood. I'll rebase my work on top of Guennadi's current patch stack
and repost.

I also have some updates to patches 3 and 4 to resolve build issues
that Magnus alerted me to. So I'll include them in my re-post as well.