From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM / Platform: Remove __weak definitions of runtime PM callbacks
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 04:24:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201104060624.23692.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=oFuSRSCLZRGwZACioCxO0WSYsOQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday, April 05, 2011, Magnus Damm wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:43 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Monday, March 28, 2011, Magnus Damm wrote:
> >> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> >> >
> >> > Remove the __weak definitions of platform bus type runtime PM
> >> > callbacks, make platform_dev_pm_ops point to the generic routines
> >> > as appropriate and allow architectures using platform_dev_pm_ops to
> >> > replace the runtime PM callbacks in that structure with their own
> >> > set.
> >> >
> >> > Convert architectures providing its own definitions of the platform
> >> > runtime PM callbacks to use the new mechanism.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> >>
> >> Looking good, thanks Rafael. Tested on the sh7372 Mackerel board.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
> >
> > Thanks, I'll put it into my for-2.6.40 queue as soon as 2.6.39-rc1 is out.
>
> Thanks. By the way, I think the symbols should be converted to static
> as well. Do you prefer to make a V2 or shall we do that incrementally?
I can fold that changed into the patch as I haven't pushed it yet.
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-06 4:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-26 23:58 [RFC][PATCH] PM / Platform: Remove __weak definitions of runtime PM callbacks Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-28 11:05 ` [RFC][PATCH] PM / Platform: Remove __weak definitions of runtime Magnus Damm
2011-03-28 19:43 ` [RFC][PATCH] PM / Platform: Remove __weak definitions of runtime PM callbacks Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-05 7:17 ` [RFC][PATCH] PM / Platform: Remove __weak definitions of runtime Magnus Damm
2011-04-06 4:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2011-03-29 3:13 ` [RFC][PATCH] PM / Platform: Remove __weak definitions of runtime PM callbacks Paul Mundt
2011-04-06 22:35 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 5:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-07 5:48 ` [RFC][PATCH] PM / Platform: Remove __weak definitions of runtime Grant Likely
2011-04-07 6:15 ` [RFC][PATCH] PM / Platform: Remove __weak definitions of runtime PM callbacks Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-07 7:09 ` [RFC][PATCH] PM / Platform: Remove __weak definitions of runtime Grant Likely
2011-04-07 5:44 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201104060624.23692.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).