From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mundt Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 16:56:54 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] ARM: move SH-mobile runtime PM to arm/common for sharing with other platforms Message-Id: <20110407165654.GD8052@linux-sh.org> List-Id: References: <1302134569-22825-1-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com> <1302134569-22825-5-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <1302134569-22825-5-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:02:47PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > There is really nothing SH-mobile specific about this runtime PM > implementation. Any platform wanting to implement runtime PM based on > simple clock gating can use this implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman This observation is wholly architecture agnostic, so it's not clear that keeping it in arch/arm/common is any better. It seems that this would be better suited for drivers/base/power/ with a generic Kconfig symbol.