From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:43:06 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] clk: Initial feedback for off-SoC slow bus clocks Message-Id: <20110711114304.GJ5092@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> List-Id: References: <20110711025344.GA27497@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20110711093124.GA3239@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110711100759.GG26347@pengutronix.de> <20110711102856.GG3239@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110711104625.GH26347@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20110711104625.GH26347@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:46:25PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:28:56AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > If that's all its for, then can't some other solution for debugfs names > > (lets stop calling them clock names to avoid confusion) be found - > > such as > > sprintf(debugfsname, "%s@%p", clk->debugfsprefix, clk); > Sounds good. During my tests on i.MX I found it very convenient to have > speaking debugfs names, so I vote for this suggestion instead the > following ones. FWIW that's pretty much exactly what I added except I used a - instead of @.