From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 23:47:57 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Consistent spelling of cpuidle_idle_call() Message-Id: <20110804234755.GA13321@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> List-Id: References: <1312475071-22973-1-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org> <4E3AD5E7.6040105@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <4E3AD5E7.6040105@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 10:24:55AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 08/04/2011 09:24 AM, David Brown wrote: > > Commit a0bfa1373859e9d11dc92561a8667588803e42d8 mispells > > cpuidle_idle_call() on ARM and SH code. Fix this to be consistent. > > The referenced commit breaks compilation on ARM, and appears it would > > do so on SH as well. > Mark Brown sent this patch[1] months ago when this build breakage was > noticed in linux-next. What happened to that patch? It looks like the > patch that introduced the breakage was pulled from linux-next shortly > after and then reintroduced today. Yeah, as far as I remember Stephen applied my patch to -next as Len didn't respond to it.