SUPERH platform development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Subject: [Replacement][PATCH 1/2 v2] PM: Use spinlock instead of mutex in clock management functions
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 06:18:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201108220818.48725.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201108212110.45316.rjw@sisk.pl>

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

The lock member of struct pm_clk_data is of type struct mutex,
which is a problem, because the suspend and resume routines
defined in drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c cannot be executed
with interrupts disabled for this reason.  Modify
struct pm_clk_data so that its lock member is a spinlock.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---

The previous [1/2] in this series was on top of the branch at

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git pm-domains

but what is needed now is a version on top of the current mainline tree, which
is this one.

Thanks,
Rafael

---
 drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c |   40 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Index: linux/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
=================================--- linux.orig/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
+++ linux/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 
 struct pm_clk_data {
 	struct list_head clock_list;
-	struct mutex lock;
+	spinlock_t lock;
 };
 
 enum pce_status {
@@ -73,9 +73,9 @@ int pm_clk_add(struct device *dev, const
 		}
 	}
 
-	mutex_lock(&pcd->lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&pcd->lock);
 	list_add_tail(&ce->node, &pcd->clock_list);
-	mutex_unlock(&pcd->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&pcd->lock);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -83,8 +83,8 @@ int pm_clk_add(struct device *dev, const
  * __pm_clk_remove - Destroy PM clock entry.
  * @ce: PM clock entry to destroy.
  *
- * This routine must be called under the mutex protecting the PM list of clocks
- * corresponding the the @ce's device.
+ * This routine must be called under the spinlock protecting the PM list of
+ * clocks corresponding the the @ce's device.
  */
 static void __pm_clk_remove(struct pm_clock_entry *ce)
 {
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ void pm_clk_remove(struct device *dev, c
 	if (!pcd)
 		return;
 
-	mutex_lock(&pcd->lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&pcd->lock);
 
 	list_for_each_entry(ce, &pcd->clock_list, node) {
 		if (!con_id && !ce->con_id) {
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ void pm_clk_remove(struct device *dev, c
 		}
 	}
 
-	mutex_unlock(&pcd->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&pcd->lock);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ int pm_clk_init(struct device *dev)
 	}
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcd->clock_list);
-	mutex_init(&pcd->lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&pcd->lock);
 	dev->power.subsys_data = pcd;
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -181,12 +181,12 @@ void pm_clk_destroy(struct device *dev)
 
 	dev->power.subsys_data = NULL;
 
-	mutex_lock(&pcd->lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&pcd->lock);
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(ce, c, &pcd->clock_list, node)
 		__pm_clk_remove(ce);
 
-	mutex_unlock(&pcd->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&pcd->lock);
 
 	kfree(pcd);
 }
@@ -220,13 +220,14 @@ int pm_clk_suspend(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct pm_clk_data *pcd = __to_pcd(dev);
 	struct pm_clock_entry *ce;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
 
 	if (!pcd)
 		return 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&pcd->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&pcd->lock, flags);
 
 	list_for_each_entry_reverse(ce, &pcd->clock_list, node) {
 		if (ce->status = PCE_STATUS_NONE)
@@ -238,7 +239,7 @@ int pm_clk_suspend(struct device *dev)
 		}
 	}
 
-	mutex_unlock(&pcd->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcd->lock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -251,13 +252,14 @@ int pm_clk_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct pm_clk_data *pcd = __to_pcd(dev);
 	struct pm_clock_entry *ce;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
 
 	if (!pcd)
 		return 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&pcd->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&pcd->lock, flags);
 
 	list_for_each_entry(ce, &pcd->clock_list, node) {
 		if (ce->status = PCE_STATUS_NONE)
@@ -269,7 +271,7 @@ int pm_clk_resume(struct device *dev)
 		}
 	}
 
-	mutex_unlock(&pcd->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcd->lock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -344,6 +346,7 @@ int pm_clk_suspend(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct pm_clk_data *pcd = __to_pcd(dev);
 	struct pm_clock_entry *ce;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
 
@@ -351,12 +354,12 @@ int pm_clk_suspend(struct device *dev)
 	if (!pcd || !dev->driver)
 		return 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&pcd->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&pcd->lock, flags);
 
 	list_for_each_entry_reverse(ce, &pcd->clock_list, node)
 		clk_disable(ce->clk);
 
-	mutex_unlock(&pcd->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcd->lock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -369,6 +372,7 @@ int pm_clk_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct pm_clk_data *pcd = __to_pcd(dev);
 	struct pm_clock_entry *ce;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
 
@@ -376,12 +380,12 @@ int pm_clk_resume(struct device *dev)
 	if (!pcd || !dev->driver)
 		return 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&pcd->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&pcd->lock, flags);
 
 	list_for_each_entry(ce, &pcd->clock_list, node)
 		clk_enable(ce->clk);
 
-	mutex_unlock(&pcd->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcd->lock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
 }


  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-22  6:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-20 19:31 [PATCH 0/2] sh-sci / PM: Fix problem with runtime PM callbacks run with interrupts off Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-20 19:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] PM / Runtime: Introduce pm_runtime_irq_unsafe() Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-21 14:55   ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2011-08-21 18:09     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-20 19:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] sh-sci / PM: Use power.irq_safe Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-21 19:09 ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] sh-sci / PM: Fix problem with runtime PM callbacks run with interrupts off Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-21 19:10   ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] PM: Change PM subsys_data lock type into spinlock Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-22  6:18     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2011-08-21 19:11   ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] sh-sci / PM: Use power.irq_safe Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-24  5:33     ` Paul Mundt
2011-08-24 20:52       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-25  1:33         ` Paul Mundt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201108220818.48725.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox