From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Subject: [Replacement][PATCH 1/2 v2] PM: Use spinlock instead of mutex in clock management functions
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 06:18:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201108220818.48725.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201108212110.45316.rjw@sisk.pl>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
The lock member of struct pm_clk_data is of type struct mutex,
which is a problem, because the suspend and resume routines
defined in drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c cannot be executed
with interrupts disabled for this reason. Modify
struct pm_clk_data so that its lock member is a spinlock.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
The previous [1/2] in this series was on top of the branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git pm-domains
but what is needed now is a version on top of the current mainline tree, which
is this one.
Thanks,
Rafael
---
drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Index: linux/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
=================================--- linux.orig/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
+++ linux/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
struct pm_clk_data {
struct list_head clock_list;
- struct mutex lock;
+ spinlock_t lock;
};
enum pce_status {
@@ -73,9 +73,9 @@ int pm_clk_add(struct device *dev, const
}
}
- mutex_lock(&pcd->lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&pcd->lock);
list_add_tail(&ce->node, &pcd->clock_list);
- mutex_unlock(&pcd->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&pcd->lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -83,8 +83,8 @@ int pm_clk_add(struct device *dev, const
* __pm_clk_remove - Destroy PM clock entry.
* @ce: PM clock entry to destroy.
*
- * This routine must be called under the mutex protecting the PM list of clocks
- * corresponding the the @ce's device.
+ * This routine must be called under the spinlock protecting the PM list of
+ * clocks corresponding the the @ce's device.
*/
static void __pm_clk_remove(struct pm_clock_entry *ce)
{
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ void pm_clk_remove(struct device *dev, c
if (!pcd)
return;
- mutex_lock(&pcd->lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&pcd->lock);
list_for_each_entry(ce, &pcd->clock_list, node) {
if (!con_id && !ce->con_id) {
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ void pm_clk_remove(struct device *dev, c
}
}
- mutex_unlock(&pcd->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&pcd->lock);
}
/**
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ int pm_clk_init(struct device *dev)
}
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcd->clock_list);
- mutex_init(&pcd->lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&pcd->lock);
dev->power.subsys_data = pcd;
return 0;
}
@@ -181,12 +181,12 @@ void pm_clk_destroy(struct device *dev)
dev->power.subsys_data = NULL;
- mutex_lock(&pcd->lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&pcd->lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(ce, c, &pcd->clock_list, node)
__pm_clk_remove(ce);
- mutex_unlock(&pcd->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&pcd->lock);
kfree(pcd);
}
@@ -220,13 +220,14 @@ int pm_clk_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
struct pm_clk_data *pcd = __to_pcd(dev);
struct pm_clock_entry *ce;
+ unsigned long flags;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
if (!pcd)
return 0;
- mutex_lock(&pcd->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&pcd->lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry_reverse(ce, &pcd->clock_list, node) {
if (ce->status = PCE_STATUS_NONE)
@@ -238,7 +239,7 @@ int pm_clk_suspend(struct device *dev)
}
}
- mutex_unlock(&pcd->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcd->lock, flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -251,13 +252,14 @@ int pm_clk_resume(struct device *dev)
{
struct pm_clk_data *pcd = __to_pcd(dev);
struct pm_clock_entry *ce;
+ unsigned long flags;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
if (!pcd)
return 0;
- mutex_lock(&pcd->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&pcd->lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(ce, &pcd->clock_list, node) {
if (ce->status = PCE_STATUS_NONE)
@@ -269,7 +271,7 @@ int pm_clk_resume(struct device *dev)
}
}
- mutex_unlock(&pcd->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcd->lock, flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -344,6 +346,7 @@ int pm_clk_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
struct pm_clk_data *pcd = __to_pcd(dev);
struct pm_clock_entry *ce;
+ unsigned long flags;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
@@ -351,12 +354,12 @@ int pm_clk_suspend(struct device *dev)
if (!pcd || !dev->driver)
return 0;
- mutex_lock(&pcd->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&pcd->lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry_reverse(ce, &pcd->clock_list, node)
clk_disable(ce->clk);
- mutex_unlock(&pcd->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcd->lock, flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -369,6 +372,7 @@ int pm_clk_resume(struct device *dev)
{
struct pm_clk_data *pcd = __to_pcd(dev);
struct pm_clock_entry *ce;
+ unsigned long flags;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
@@ -376,12 +380,12 @@ int pm_clk_resume(struct device *dev)
if (!pcd || !dev->driver)
return 0;
- mutex_lock(&pcd->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&pcd->lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(ce, &pcd->clock_list, node)
clk_enable(ce->clk);
- mutex_unlock(&pcd->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcd->lock, flags);
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-22 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-20 19:31 [PATCH 0/2] sh-sci / PM: Fix problem with runtime PM callbacks run with interrupts off Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-20 19:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] PM / Runtime: Introduce pm_runtime_irq_unsafe() Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-21 14:55 ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2011-08-21 18:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-20 19:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] sh-sci / PM: Use power.irq_safe Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-21 19:09 ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] sh-sci / PM: Fix problem with runtime PM callbacks run with interrupts off Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-21 19:10 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] PM: Change PM subsys_data lock type into spinlock Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-22 6:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2011-08-21 19:11 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] sh-sci / PM: Use power.irq_safe Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-24 5:33 ` Paul Mundt
2011-08-24 20:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-25 1:33 ` Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201108220818.48725.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox