From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Frysinger Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 23:12:28 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Change ARCH_NR_GPIO into a Kconfig variable Message-Id: <201111031912.33040.vapier@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="nextPart1436663.HJnIWhvqZU" List-Id: References: <1320339647-30255-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> <20111103224452.GS12913@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <201111031907.46434.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201111031907.46434.vapier@gentoo.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org --nextPart1436663.HJnIWhvqZU Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday 03 November 2011 19:07:42 Mike Frysinger wrote: > i'm aware of these efforts, but i don't see how this Kconfig solution gets > you there. it's still a single define depending on arch-specific knobs.= =20 > now, if this were treated as a max value that was based on all the arch > needs, it's now useful across SoCs. s/arch/mach/g =2Dmike --nextPart1436663.HJnIWhvqZU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJOsx/gAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBvwEP/2BOrHVDTP0ctjIWGNSMRRsE f3Wv0ukiY1DHs+1wMJSLzfGIqHsxtZ/FyJR7cwNfXRRlkgaqy4huO0HbtOf8aYl0 nS+fWjq9KmBC2bdr1jKNxVAJ3dFzjXTdTS0F3+dXsdL00lIUA1xA4t7SoBDgOvHO 2EbnuEYwjRspRGZyJQ6BLZj92NxjrQKQx1EaWOe7qQ+JlJuCNcLl0zTFFH7qAoRr pkf41Lg/9L5MmiYxKqbKmCz7zUr9rGogXu3nJ1GU0WfWGpJ4A6B3aQZHzzWHGKtI dLOhX8RMP+Hxb3gtF+xauZ8s7yJSx9AcGX7R3VPLLZtwyvH9MdmuVJXpbnGMOfA0 Sb8n5W6/oU6mgP7V4+m0C+GMDAJ3Yb0TKnO54IRoOXRZLZGFfI5asVdvy4Aebppc SV1pyaZXEX4y4zVJuieIEhZFVccKQH374UFH4i0DZJaOQuztvk3D2tU2QxirJlHu J/BPDo+BAJnkXv3w4UgTF2hAB/CZ/9FTkzaBrbh37GPJebyl2gyt2wIkvkmF4gr1 Fptm21lr2zb2Q9a636+W51RLG6KfDqASoq9vH4fr0kgYIymspgsXsqzksuwahO8/ AoRGdJrAM0M9lqKgh5uZ5fJbToruuRexmGecKS/F6X8QSJZqk3iRd/9tW3arkAhj Nx+0JlV4iXBkIxSSCjyR =VaoW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1436663.HJnIWhvqZU--