From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mundt Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:25:24 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: mach-shmobile: add a resource name for shdma Message-Id: <20120110082524.GE24305@linux-sh.org> List-Id: References: <4F0BCADB.8010709@renesas.com> In-Reply-To: <4F0BCADB.8010709@renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 05:22:49PM +0900, Shimoda, Yoshihiro wrote: > 2012/01/10 16:43, Paul Mundt wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 02:21:31PM +0900, Shimoda, Yoshihiro wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda > >> --- > >> This patch depends on the following patch: > >> - dmaengine: shdma: modify the DMAC Address Error registration > >> > > What exactly does it depend on? If it's just wiring up the string, we can > > merge that at any time, and the earlier the better. Setting the string > > doesn't introduce any different behaviour in the driver as it is now > > without the change in registration. > > > > I'm sorry for my wrong comment. Your point is correct. > This patch doesn't depend on the shdma's patch. > > Should I submit the patch which removed the comment again? > No, it's fine, just wanted to make sure there wasn't something sinister going on that I wasn't aware of with regards to the driver model. I'll apply them to sh/rmobile-latest respectively.