From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:58:17 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/13] ARM: only include mach/irqs.h for !SPARSE_IRQ Message-Id: <201201252358.17825.marek.vasut@gmail.com> List-Id: References: <1327091591-27125-1-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com> <20120125213206.GJ1068@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > As a side-note, you may be pleased to know that I have SA11x0 stuff > > converted to (and tested) with sparse IRQ. That's with SA1111, the > > UCB1x00 and Neponset expansion board for the Assabet all dynamically > > allocating their IRQs. The only fixed-numbered IRQs in SA11x0 in my > > tree at the time of writing are the on-SoC IRQs, and the LoCoMo IRQs > > (which I don't have the hardware to test for, so I'm not touching.) > > That's really cool. > > Not that there are many people who might still benefit from running that > code, but like I said this should serve as a real and relatively simple > example that might benefit more complex platforms. > > > Nicolas Indeed, that's good going. I'm CCing a guy who might have a SA11xx board with LoCoMo chip (that's old zaurus sl55xx, right?).