Re: [PATCH 00/17] sh and mach-shmobile struct sh_clk_ops rename

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>]

On Wednesday, March 07, 2012, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 11:24:20PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 06, 2012, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > > There are a few ways to do this I suppose. A common topic branch that we
> > > can pull in to either the SH or ARM side makes sense. We can do the
> > > entire series in one topic branch that gets merged twice and we just make
> > > sure that no rebasing takes place, or we can do patches 1-2 on a common
> > > branch, then 3-8 on an rmobile branch based on the common on, 9-16 on an
> > > sh one, and then leave 17 for the end of the merge window.
> > > 
> > > Ultimately it depends on how much more work there is going to be done
> > > built on top of this. The sh changes are minimal, so I'm not too worried
> > > about merge conflicts even if we just keep all of these batched together.
> > 
> > OK, so would you mind if I created a clk_ops-rename branch in the renesas
> > tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/renesas.git
> > and put the whole $subject series into it?
> > 
> Sounds fine to me.

Done.

Thanks,
Rafael