From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:40:27 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] um: Should hold tasklist_lock while traversing processes
Message-Id: <20120423154027.GA23066@lizard>
List-Id: <linux-sh.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20120423070641.GA27702@lizard> <20120423070925.GG30752@lizard>
 <4F956DF2.7020408@nod.at>
In-Reply-To: <4F956DF2.7020408@nod.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 04:57:54PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On 23.04.2012 09:09, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> >Traversing the tasks requires holding tasklist_lock, otherwise it
> >is unsafe.
> >
> >p.s. However, I'm not sure that calling os_kill_ptraced_process()
> >in the atomic context is correct. It seem to work, but please
> >take a closer look.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov<anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
> >---
> 
> You forgot my Ack and I've already explained why
> os_kill_ptraced_process() is fine.

Ouch, sorry!

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
Email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com