From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 23:17:05 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: fixup reversed deferred probe order Message-Id: <20120612231705.GB6177@kroah.com> List-Id: References: <20120529064621.GB6166@verge.net.au> <20120529070458.GB11445@linux-sh.org> <20120529073313.GA21702@verge.net.au> <87k3zvmo4r.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <20120529091129.GA26043@verge.net.au> <87txyy347i.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <87sjei325k.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <20120530013056.GA31474@verge.net.au> <87r4u2310j.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <87pq9m30h1.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> In-Reply-To: <87pq9m30h1.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Kuninori Morimoto Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Simon Horman , Paul Mundt , Rafael , Mark Brown , Magnus , Linux-SH , Kuninori Morimoto On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 06:46:06PM -0700, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > If driver requests probe deferral, > it will be added to deferred_probe_pending_list > by driver_deferred_probe_add(), but, it used list_add(). > Because of that, deferred probe will be run as reversed order. > This patch uses list_add_tail(), and solved this issue. Is this causing a problem with 3.5-rc2 on some systems, so it needs to get into 3.5-final, or can it wait for 3.6? thanks, greg k-h