From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] irqdomain: Support one-shot tear down of domain mappings.
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:35:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120615183518.514853E0ACE@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339572841-26175-2-git-send-email-lethal@linux-sh.org>
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:34:01 +0900, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
> This implements a sledgehammer approach for batched domain unmapping
> regardless of domain type. In the linear revmap case it's fairly easy to
> track state and iterate over the IRQs disposing of them one at a time,
> but it's not always so straightforward in the radix tree case.
>
> A new irq_domain_dispose_mappings() is added to ensure all of the
> mappings are appropriately discarded, and is to be used prior to domain
> removal. Gang lookups are batched, presently 16 at a time, for no reason
> other than it seemed like a good number at the time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
> ---
> include/linux/irqdomain.h | 1 +
> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> index 58defd5..6f27c55 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ static inline int irq_domain_associate(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int i
> extern unsigned int irq_create_mapping(struct irq_domain *host,
> irq_hw_number_t hwirq);
> extern void irq_dispose_mapping(unsigned int virq);
> +extern void irq_domain_dispose_mappings(struct irq_domain *domain);
> extern unsigned int irq_find_mapping(struct irq_domain *host,
> irq_hw_number_t hwirq);
> extern unsigned int irq_create_direct_mapping(struct irq_domain *host);
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> index 8591cb6..40c9ba1 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> @@ -546,6 +546,49 @@ void irq_dispose_mapping(unsigned int virq)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_dispose_mapping);
>
> +#define IRQ_DOMAIN_BATCH_IRQS 16
> +
> +/**
> + * irq_domain_dispose_mappings() - Dispose of all mappings in a domain
> + * @domain: domain to tear down
> + */
> +void irq_domain_dispose_mappings(struct irq_domain *domain)
> +{
> + if (domain->revmap_type = IRQ_DOMAIN_MAP_NOMAP)
> + return;
> +
> + if (domain->linear_size) {
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < domain->linear_size; i++)
> + irq_dispose_mapping(domain->linear_revmap[i]);
> + } else {
The 'else' should be dropped I think. With the merge of linear and
tree mappings into the same domain type, it is possible for a domain
to have both linear and tree mappings in the same instance. So tree
needs to be cleared even if linear_size is non-zero.
> + struct irq_data *irq_data_batch[IRQ_DOMAIN_BATCH_IRQS];
> + unsigned int nr_found;
> + unsigned long index = 0;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> +
> + for (;;) {
Nit; while not 'while(1)'?
> + int i;
Nit; move 'i' up with nr_found above.
> +
> + nr_found = radix_tree_gang_lookup(&domain->radix_tree,
> + (void **)irq_data_batch, index,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(irq_data_batch));
> + if (!nr_found)
> + break;
Or better:
while (nr_found = radix_tree_gang_lookup(&domain->radix_tree,
(void **)irq_data_batch, index,
ARRAY_SIZE(irq_data_batch))) {
Otherwise seems okay... though the gang lookup feels more complex than
it needs to be.
g.
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_found; i++)
> + irq_dispose_mapping(irq_data_batch[i]->irq);
> +
> + index += nr_found;
> + }
> +
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_domain_dispose_mappings);
> +
> /**
> * irq_find_mapping() - Find a linux irq from an hw irq number.
> * @domain: domain owning this hardware interrupt
> --
> 1.7.9.rc0.28.g0e1cf
>
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-15 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-13 7:34 [PATCH 1/2] irqdomain: Fix up linear revmap for non-zero hwirq displacement Paul Mundt
2012-06-13 7:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] irqdomain: Support one-shot tear down of domain mappings Paul Mundt
2012-06-15 18:35 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2012-06-15 22:34 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-17 23:48 ` Grant Likely
2012-06-15 18:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] irqdomain: Fix up linear revmap for non-zero hwirq displacement Grant Likely
2012-06-15 23:14 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-21 1:19 ` Paul Mundt
2012-07-11 15:22 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120615183518.514853E0ACE@localhost \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).