From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 07:08:26 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] sh/ARM: shmobile: add sh_clk_fsidiv_register()
Message-Id: <20121031070817.GE31555@verge.net.au>
List-Id: <linux-sh.vger.kernel.org>
References: <87ip9rmjcb.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
In-Reply-To: <87ip9rmjcb.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 08:05:59PM -0700, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> 
> Hi Paul, Simon
> 
> These patches add sh_clk_fsidiv_register() for FSI-DIV clock control.
> This is 1st step of FSI-DT support.
> My plan is...
> 
>  1st : sh/ARM: add FSI-DIV clock control functions
>  2nd : FSI driver supports audio clock calculation method
>  3rd : sh/ARM: remove old style .set_rate callback from platform
>  4th : FSI support DT
>  5th : platform use DT for FSI
> 
> Kuninori Morimoto (3):
>       sh: clkfwk: add sh_clk_fsidiv_register()
>       ARM: shmobile: sh7372: sh7372_fsidivX_clk become non-global
>       ARM: shmobile: sh7372: use sh_clk_fsidiv_register() for FSI-DIV clocks

I am slightly confused about why 4 patches, but its not a big deal.

Paul, how do you want to handle merging this?  The 1st patch looks like its
appropriate for your tree while the rest seem to belong in my tree. But I'm
happy for all the changes to go through one tree if that makes sense.