From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:39:02 +0000
Subject: Re: shmobile and struct sys_timer removal conflicts
Message-Id: <20130121003902.GE19062@verge.net.au>
List-Id: <linux-sh.vger.kernel.org>
References: <50F445E5.6010203@wwwdotorg.org>
 <20130115004230.GZ7185@verge.net.au>
In-Reply-To: <20130115004230.GZ7185@verge.net.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 09:42:30AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:52:37AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > Simon,
> > 
> > I notice that the following shmobile-related commits in next-20130114
> > add new ARM machine descriptors, but set the .timer field rather than
> > the new .init_time field. I believe the code in these commits won't
> > build in linux-next or Linux 3.9 once it's released:
> > 
> > a625586 ARM: mach-shmobile: kzm9g: Reference DT implementation
> > ac0876f ARM: shmobile: armadillo800eva: Reference DT implementation
> > be1fc65 ARM: shmobile: add a reference DT implementation for mackerel
> > 66f1162 ARM: mach-shmobile: sh73a0: Minimal setup using DT
> > 
> > In order to solve this problem, you'll need to adjust those changes
> > according to:
> > 
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git timer/cleanup
> > 
> > (where "adjust" is probably "rebase on top of")
> 
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> thanks. I'll get this sorted out.

This should be resolved in the next branch of the renesas tree now.