* Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Use gpio_request_one() in SH Mobile board code
2013-01-24 12:16 [PATCH v2 0/8] Use gpio_request_one() in SH Mobile board code Laurent Pinchart
@ 2013-01-25 2:31 ` Simon Horman
2013-01-25 9:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2013-01-25 2:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sh
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 01:16:27PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here are the second version of the gpio_request_one() patches for all SH Mobile
> board files.
>
> Compared to v1 the patches have been rebased on top of "[PATCH v4 00/81] SH pin
> control and GPIO rework", as the previous base isn't ready for mainline yet.
> The patches are otherwise unchanged.
>
> Simon, with the appropriate acks I think this series could go to v3.9. If you
> would like a pull request, on which of your branches should I rebase the
> patches ? I've tried to rebase them on top of your current next branch and they
> apply fine, so picking them up from the mailing list shouldn't be an issue
> either.
Picking them up from the ML is no problem for me. Though I should wait for
some acks, right?
As a guide:
The way that I would pick them up would be to apply them to the boards
branch - which I have just yet again re-based and pushed. I have finally
sent out a pull-request for boards and hope that it is finally stable.
> Laurent Pinchart (8):
> ARM: shmobile: ag5evm: Use gpio_request_one()
> ARM: shmobile: ap4evb: Use gpio_request_one()
> ARM: shmobile: armadillo800eva: Use gpio_request_one()
> ARM: shmobile: armadillo800eva: Use gpio_set_value() to set GPIO
> value
> ARM: shmobile: bonito: Use gpio_request_one()
> ARM: shmobile: kota2: Use gpio_request_one()
> ARM: shmobile: kzm9g: Use gpio_request_one()
> ARM: shmobile: mackerel: Use gpio_request_one()
>
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ag5evm.c | 22 ++++-------
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ap4evb.c | 33 +++++-----------
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-armadillo800eva.c | 52 ++++++++++----------------
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bonito.c | 7 ++--
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kota2.c | 9 ++---
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g.c | 18 +++------
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-mackerel.c | 16 +++-----
> 7 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Use gpio_request_one() in SH Mobile board code
2013-01-24 12:16 [PATCH v2 0/8] Use gpio_request_one() in SH Mobile board code Laurent Pinchart
2013-01-25 2:31 ` Simon Horman
@ 2013-01-25 9:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-01-25 10:13 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2013-01-25 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sh
Hi Simon,
On Friday 25 January 2013 11:31:08 Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 01:16:27PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Here are the second version of the gpio_request_one() patches for all SH
> > Mobile board files.
> >
> > Compared to v1 the patches have been rebased on top of "[PATCH v4 00/81]
> > SH pin control and GPIO rework", as the previous base isn't ready for
> > mainline yet. The patches are otherwise unchanged.
> >
> > Simon, with the appropriate acks I think this series could go to v3.9. If
> > you would like a pull request, on which of your branches should I rebase
> > the patches ? I've tried to rebase them on top of your current next
> > branch and they apply fine, so picking them up from the mailing list
> > shouldn't be an issue either.
>
> Picking them up from the ML is no problem for me. Though I should wait for
> some acks, right?
Yes, I hope someone will ack them (Guennadi, maybe ? ;-)).
> As a guide:
>
> The way that I would pick them up would be to apply them to the boards
> branch - which I have just yet again re-based and pushed. I have finally
> sent out a pull-request for boards and hope that it is finally stable.
OK, I'll base this kind of patches on your board branch in the future.
> > Laurent Pinchart (8):
> > ARM: shmobile: ag5evm: Use gpio_request_one()
> > ARM: shmobile: ap4evb: Use gpio_request_one()
> > ARM: shmobile: armadillo800eva: Use gpio_request_one()
> > ARM: shmobile: armadillo800eva: Use gpio_set_value() to set GPIO
> > value
> > ARM: shmobile: bonito: Use gpio_request_one()
> > ARM: shmobile: kota2: Use gpio_request_one()
> > ARM: shmobile: kzm9g: Use gpio_request_one()
> > ARM: shmobile: mackerel: Use gpio_request_one()
> >
> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ag5evm.c | 22 ++++-------
> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ap4evb.c | 33 +++++-----------
> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-armadillo800eva.c | 52 ++++++++-------------
> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bonito.c | 7 ++--
> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kota2.c | 9 ++---
> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g.c | 18 +++------
> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-mackerel.c | 16 +++-----
> > 7 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Use gpio_request_one() in SH Mobile board code
2013-01-24 12:16 [PATCH v2 0/8] Use gpio_request_one() in SH Mobile board code Laurent Pinchart
2013-01-25 2:31 ` Simon Horman
2013-01-25 9:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
@ 2013-01-25 10:13 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-01-28 0:50 ` Simon Horman
2013-01-28 1:01 ` Simon Horman
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski @ 2013-01-25 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sh
Hi Laurent
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here are the second version of the gpio_request_one() patches for all SH Mobile
> board files.
>
> Compared to v1 the patches have been rebased on top of "[PATCH v4 00/81] SH pin
> control and GPIO rework", as the previous base isn't ready for mainline yet.
> The patches are otherwise unchanged.
>
> Simon, with the appropriate acks I think this series could go to v3.9. If you
> would like a pull request, on which of your branches should I rebase the
> patches ? I've tried to rebase them on top of your current next branch and they
> apply fine, so picking them up from the mailing list shouldn't be an issue
> either.
>
> Laurent Pinchart (8):
All look good to me:
Acked-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Thanks
Guennadi
> ARM: shmobile: ag5evm: Use gpio_request_one()
> ARM: shmobile: ap4evb: Use gpio_request_one()
> ARM: shmobile: armadillo800eva: Use gpio_request_one()
> ARM: shmobile: armadillo800eva: Use gpio_set_value() to set GPIO
> value
> ARM: shmobile: bonito: Use gpio_request_one()
> ARM: shmobile: kota2: Use gpio_request_one()
> ARM: shmobile: kzm9g: Use gpio_request_one()
> ARM: shmobile: mackerel: Use gpio_request_one()
>
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ag5evm.c | 22 ++++-------
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ap4evb.c | 33 +++++-----------
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-armadillo800eva.c | 52 ++++++++++----------------
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bonito.c | 7 ++--
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kota2.c | 9 ++---
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g.c | 18 +++------
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-mackerel.c | 16 +++-----
> 7 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Use gpio_request_one() in SH Mobile board code
2013-01-24 12:16 [PATCH v2 0/8] Use gpio_request_one() in SH Mobile board code Laurent Pinchart
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-25 10:13 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
@ 2013-01-28 0:50 ` Simon Horman
2013-01-28 1:01 ` Simon Horman
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2013-01-28 0:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sh
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:13:13AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi Laurent
>
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Here are the second version of the gpio_request_one() patches for all SH Mobile
> > board files.
> >
> > Compared to v1 the patches have been rebased on top of "[PATCH v4 00/81] SH pin
> > control and GPIO rework", as the previous base isn't ready for mainline yet.
> > The patches are otherwise unchanged.
> >
> > Simon, with the appropriate acks I think this series could go to v3.9. If you
> > would like a pull request, on which of your branches should I rebase the
> > patches ? I've tried to rebase them on top of your current next branch and they
> > apply fine, so picking them up from the mailing list shouldn't be an issue
> > either.
> >
> > Laurent Pinchart (8):
>
> All look good to me:
>
> Acked-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Thanks, I'll apply this series.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Use gpio_request_one() in SH Mobile board code
2013-01-24 12:16 [PATCH v2 0/8] Use gpio_request_one() in SH Mobile board code Laurent Pinchart
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-28 0:50 ` Simon Horman
@ 2013-01-28 1:01 ` Simon Horman
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2013-01-28 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sh
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:50:58AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:13:13AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Hi Laurent
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Here are the second version of the gpio_request_one() patches for all SH Mobile
> > > board files.
> > >
> > > Compared to v1 the patches have been rebased on top of "[PATCH v4 00/81] SH pin
> > > control and GPIO rework", as the previous base isn't ready for mainline yet.
> > > The patches are otherwise unchanged.
> > >
> > > Simon, with the appropriate acks I think this series could go to v3.9. If you
> > > would like a pull request, on which of your branches should I rebase the
> > > patches ? I've tried to rebase them on top of your current next branch and they
> > > apply fine, so picking them up from the mailing list shouldn't be an issue
> > > either.
> > >
> > > Laurent Pinchart (8):
> >
> > All look good to me:
> >
> > Acked-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
>
> Thanks, I'll apply this series.
I have applied them to the boards2 branch, which I plan to send a
pull-request for once the pull-request boards branch, which boards2 is
based on, has been accepted (or rejected!).
I have also merged the changes into the next branch so they should
appear in linux-next in the not too distant future.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread