From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 05:27:44 +0000
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Renesas ARM based emev2 SoC updates for v3.11
Message-Id: <20130528052744.GA25005@verge.net.au>
List-Id: <linux-sh.vger.kernel.org>
References: <1369573523-10980-1-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
 <20130528031826.GE13532@quad.lixom.net>
In-Reply-To: <20130528031826.GE13532@quad.lixom.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 08:18:26PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 10:05:22PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > Hi Arnd, Hi Olof,
> > 
> > The following changes since commit c7788792a5e7b0d5d7f96d0766b4cb6112d47d75:
> > 
> >   Linux 3.10-rc2 (2013-05-20 14:37:38 -0700)
> > 
> > are available in the git repository at:
> > 
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/horms/renesas.git tags/renesas-soc-emev2-for-v3.11
> > 
> > for you to fetch changes up to 94a6af856df56ed39bb59ebe17bfa2d10fb333f2:
> > 
> >   ARM: shmobile: emev2: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description (2013-05-22 21:42:03 +0900)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> You could have grouped all of the SoC updates into one branch instead of
> sending them up SoC by SoC to us. Either way works, just letting you know
> there's no need to keep them separate if that's easier.

Thanks, I think it would have been easier to merge each of the soc-branches
into a single branch and send a single request. I will do so in future.

> Also, the changes from Maxime could all have gone into one cleanup branch
> together instead of with the SoC code.

Sorry, I missed that somehow.

> Anyway, no harm done, I've pulled this branch (and will pull the others as
> well) into our next/soc branch.

Thanks!