From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 05:45:17 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sh-pfc: r8a7779: Don't group USB OVC and PENC pins Message-Id: <20130531054517.GC5009@verge.net.au> List-Id: References: <1369866529-6372-1-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> <1369866529-6372-2-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> <20130531001735.GA26684@verge.net.au> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:43:08PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:08:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Simon Horman > >> wrote: > >> > >> > From: Laurent Pinchart > >> > > >> > The USB_OVCn pins are alternate options for USB over-current detection > >> > when using a 3.3V USB interface. As they're not mandatory they can be > >> > used independently of the USB PENC pins. Don't group the USB_OVCn and > >> > PENC pins to avoid conflicts when the USB_OVCn pins are used by another > >> > function. > >> > > >> > Reported-by: Sergei Shtylyov > >> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart > >> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman > >> > >> OK, Acked-by, do you want me to take this as a fix in the pinctrl > >> tree for v3.10? > >> > >> Just asking because Simon usually takes everything else relating to > >> the SH. ... > > > > This was a pull request from my tree to arm-soc, so thats they way > > I was planning to handle things. > > > > Olof, Arnd, > > > > should I re-spin the pull request to include Linus's ack? > > You can if you want, but for an odd and specific fix like this we'll > all know he's ok with the code going in. In that case my preference is to leave the pull request as is. Could you consider merging it? As an aside, I do expect to send some more v3.10 fixes for shmobile. There seem to be more than usual.