Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Backlight drivers for SH and ARM SH-Mobile boards

[Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>]

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:17:20AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> On Wednesday 10 July 2013 10:22:34 Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:07:45AM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > On Friday, July 05, 2013 4:13 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > 
> > > > Here are three backlight drivers used by SH and ARM SH-Mobile boards.
> > > > 
> > > > The first driver supports simple GPIO-controlled backlights that are
> > > > turned on or off by a single GPIO (either active high or active low).
> > > > 
> > > > The second driver supports the Sanyo LV5207LP LED driver
> > > > (http://www.onsemi.com/pub_link/Collateral/ENA0943-D.PDF) and exposes
> > > > the main LED only as a backlight device, as that's all the board I need
> > > > to driver for uses.
> > > > 
> > > > The third driver supports the ROHM Semiconductor BD6107 LED driver (no
> > > > datasheet publicly available I'm afraid). Similarly to the LV5207LP
> > > > driver, it exposes the main LED only as a backlight device.
> > > > 
> > > > The last four patches port the ARM SH-Mobile Mackerel and AG5EVM and the
> > > > SH Ecovec24 and KFR2R09 boards to use the new backlight drivers. The
> > > > code has been compile tested on all four platforms and runtime tested on
> > > > Mackerel only as I don't have access to the other boards.
> > > > 
> > > > As the board code patches depend on the backlight drivers, the drivers
> > > > should get merged first. Richard, Jingoo, would you like to take them
> > > > through your tree, or would it be easier to merge them with the ARM and
> > > > SH patches ?
> > >
> > > Hi Laurent,
> > > 
> > > Currently, I cannot use my git tree for backlight subsystem.
> > > Also, your patches cannot affect other backlight drivers.
> > > 
> > > I think that these 7 patches would go through SH tree with my Acked-by.
> > > I will review your patches.
> > 
> > That is fine by me.
> > 
> > Laurent, can you please let me know what base - e.g. v3.11-rc1 -
> > is required for the non-shmobile patches?
> 
> The patch series is based on v3.10.

Thanks. I will queue it up once I rebase the other branches
on top of v3.11-rc1. I expect that to occur next week.