From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 02:07:16 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT
Message-Id: <20131008020712.GA7179@verge.net.au>
List-Id: <linux-sh.vger.kernel.org>
References: <878uy9259u.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
In-Reply-To: <878uy9259u.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 06:32:38PM -0700, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> 
> Hi Simon
> 
> > > > Kuninori Morimoto (7):
> > > >       1) ARM: shmobile: bockw: enable CONFIG_REGULATOR
> > > >       2) ARM: shmobile: bockw: use regulator for MMCIF
> > > >       3) ARM: shmobile: bockw: add default PFC settings on DTS
> > > >       4) ARM: shmobile: bockw: remove manual PFC settings on reference
> > > >       5) ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add MMCIF clock support for DT
> > > >       6) ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add MMCIF support on DTSI
> > > >       7) ARM: shmobile: bockw: add MMCIF support on DTS
> > > > 
> > > >  arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778-bockw-reference.dts  |   25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi                 |    8 ++++++++
> > > >  arch/arm/configs/bockw_defconfig               |    1 +
> > > >  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c |   12 ------------
> > > >  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw.c           |   13 ++++++++----
> > > >  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a7778.c         |    1 +
> > > >  6 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > And, these dpends on today's Laurent's
> > > 
> > > Subject: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in DT
> > > Date:	Thu,  3 Oct 2013 19:35:41 +0200
> > 
> > Thanks Morimoto-san.
> > 
> > Could you explain in a little more detail what the dependency is.
> > I am trying to work out if I should apply this series on top
> > of "ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in DT"
> > or if they can be merged in parallel.
> 
> "ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in DT" 
> is bugfix patch for DT.
> The kernel (especially, pfc settings = #3) doesn't work
> without it.
> Is this explain enough for you ?

Assuming that "ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in
DT" is not applied. When the pfc settings don't work does the kernel still
work as well as it did prior to patch #3 not being applied?