* [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT
@ 2013-10-04 1:28 Kuninori Morimoto
2013-10-04 1:30 ` Kuninori Morimoto
` (10 more replies)
0 siblings, 11 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kuninori Morimoto @ 2013-10-04 1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sh
Hi Simon, Magnus
These patches supports MMCIF on BockW reference.
Kuninori Morimoto (7):
1) ARM: shmobile: bockw: enable CONFIG_REGULATOR
2) ARM: shmobile: bockw: use regulator for MMCIF
3) ARM: shmobile: bockw: add default PFC settings on DTS
4) ARM: shmobile: bockw: remove manual PFC settings on reference
5) ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add MMCIF clock support for DT
6) ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add MMCIF support on DTSI
7) ARM: shmobile: bockw: add MMCIF support on DTS
arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778-bockw-reference.dts | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
arch/arm/configs/bockw_defconfig | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c | 12 ------------
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw.c | 13 ++++++++----
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a7778.c | 1 +
6 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Basically, these patches exchange MMCIF voltage controlling
method from manual settings to regulator settings.
after that, it try to support MMCIF on DT.
3) 4) patches support DT PFC
other patches are for MMCIF
1) is for defconfig
2) 4) is for .c file
other are for DTS/DTSI file
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT
2013-10-04 1:28 [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT Kuninori Morimoto
@ 2013-10-04 1:30 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-10-04 1:35 ` Kuninori Morimoto
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kuninori Morimoto @ 2013-10-04 1:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sh
Hi Simon
> Kuninori Morimoto (7):
> 1) ARM: shmobile: bockw: enable CONFIG_REGULATOR
> 2) ARM: shmobile: bockw: use regulator for MMCIF
> 3) ARM: shmobile: bockw: add default PFC settings on DTS
> 4) ARM: shmobile: bockw: remove manual PFC settings on reference
> 5) ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add MMCIF clock support for DT
> 6) ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add MMCIF support on DTSI
> 7) ARM: shmobile: bockw: add MMCIF support on DTS
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778-bockw-reference.dts | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
> arch/arm/configs/bockw_defconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c | 12 ------------
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw.c | 13 ++++++++----
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a7778.c | 1 +
> 6 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
These are based on renesas-devel-20131003 tag
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT
2013-10-04 1:28 [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT Kuninori Morimoto
2013-10-04 1:30 ` Kuninori Morimoto
@ 2013-10-04 1:35 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-10-08 1:11 ` Simon Horman
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kuninori Morimoto @ 2013-10-04 1:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sh
Hi Simon again
> Kuninori Morimoto (7):
> 1) ARM: shmobile: bockw: enable CONFIG_REGULATOR
> 2) ARM: shmobile: bockw: use regulator for MMCIF
> 3) ARM: shmobile: bockw: add default PFC settings on DTS
> 4) ARM: shmobile: bockw: remove manual PFC settings on reference
> 5) ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add MMCIF clock support for DT
> 6) ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add MMCIF support on DTSI
> 7) ARM: shmobile: bockw: add MMCIF support on DTS
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778-bockw-reference.dts | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
> arch/arm/configs/bockw_defconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c | 12 ------------
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw.c | 13 ++++++++----
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a7778.c | 1 +
> 6 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
And, these dpends on today's Laurent's
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in DT
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:35:41 +0200
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT
2013-10-04 1:28 [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT Kuninori Morimoto
2013-10-04 1:30 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-10-04 1:35 ` Kuninori Morimoto
@ 2013-10-08 1:11 ` Simon Horman
2013-10-08 1:32 ` Kuninori Morimoto
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2013-10-08 1:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sh
[ Cc Laurent ]
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 06:35:32PM -0700, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>
> Hi Simon again
>
> > Kuninori Morimoto (7):
> > 1) ARM: shmobile: bockw: enable CONFIG_REGULATOR
> > 2) ARM: shmobile: bockw: use regulator for MMCIF
> > 3) ARM: shmobile: bockw: add default PFC settings on DTS
> > 4) ARM: shmobile: bockw: remove manual PFC settings on reference
> > 5) ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add MMCIF clock support for DT
> > 6) ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add MMCIF support on DTSI
> > 7) ARM: shmobile: bockw: add MMCIF support on DTS
> >
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778-bockw-reference.dts | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
> > arch/arm/configs/bockw_defconfig | 1 +
> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c | 12 ------------
> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw.c | 13 ++++++++----
> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a7778.c | 1 +
> > 6 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> And, these dpends on today's Laurent's
>
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in DT
> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:35:41 +0200
Thanks Morimoto-san.
Could you explain in a little more detail what the dependency is.
I am trying to work out if I should apply this series on top
of "ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in DT"
or if they can be merged in parallel.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT
2013-10-04 1:28 [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT Kuninori Morimoto
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-10-08 1:11 ` Simon Horman
@ 2013-10-08 1:32 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-10-08 2:07 ` Simon Horman
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kuninori Morimoto @ 2013-10-08 1:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sh
Hi Simon
> > > Kuninori Morimoto (7):
> > > 1) ARM: shmobile: bockw: enable CONFIG_REGULATOR
> > > 2) ARM: shmobile: bockw: use regulator for MMCIF
> > > 3) ARM: shmobile: bockw: add default PFC settings on DTS
> > > 4) ARM: shmobile: bockw: remove manual PFC settings on reference
> > > 5) ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add MMCIF clock support for DT
> > > 6) ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add MMCIF support on DTSI
> > > 7) ARM: shmobile: bockw: add MMCIF support on DTS
> > >
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778-bockw-reference.dts | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
> > > arch/arm/configs/bockw_defconfig | 1 +
> > > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c | 12 ------------
> > > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw.c | 13 ++++++++----
> > > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a7778.c | 1 +
> > > 6 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > And, these dpends on today's Laurent's
> >
> > Subject: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in DT
> > Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:35:41 +0200
>
> Thanks Morimoto-san.
>
> Could you explain in a little more detail what the dependency is.
> I am trying to work out if I should apply this series on top
> of "ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in DT"
> or if they can be merged in parallel.
"ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in DT"
is bugfix patch for DT.
The kernel (especially, pfc settings = #3) doesn't work
without it.
Is this explain enough for you ?
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT
2013-10-04 1:28 [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT Kuninori Morimoto
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-10-08 1:32 ` Kuninori Morimoto
@ 2013-10-08 2:07 ` Simon Horman
2013-10-08 2:57 ` Kuninori Morimoto
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2013-10-08 2:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sh
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 06:32:38PM -0700, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>
> Hi Simon
>
> > > > Kuninori Morimoto (7):
> > > > 1) ARM: shmobile: bockw: enable CONFIG_REGULATOR
> > > > 2) ARM: shmobile: bockw: use regulator for MMCIF
> > > > 3) ARM: shmobile: bockw: add default PFC settings on DTS
> > > > 4) ARM: shmobile: bockw: remove manual PFC settings on reference
> > > > 5) ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add MMCIF clock support for DT
> > > > 6) ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add MMCIF support on DTSI
> > > > 7) ARM: shmobile: bockw: add MMCIF support on DTS
> > > >
> > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778-bockw-reference.dts | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
> > > > arch/arm/configs/bockw_defconfig | 1 +
> > > > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c | 12 ------------
> > > > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw.c | 13 ++++++++----
> > > > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a7778.c | 1 +
> > > > 6 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > And, these dpends on today's Laurent's
> > >
> > > Subject: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in DT
> > > Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:35:41 +0200
> >
> > Thanks Morimoto-san.
> >
> > Could you explain in a little more detail what the dependency is.
> > I am trying to work out if I should apply this series on top
> > of "ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in DT"
> > or if they can be merged in parallel.
>
> "ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in DT"
> is bugfix patch for DT.
> The kernel (especially, pfc settings = #3) doesn't work
> without it.
> Is this explain enough for you ?
Assuming that "ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in
DT" is not applied. When the pfc settings don't work does the kernel still
work as well as it did prior to patch #3 not being applied?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT
2013-10-04 1:28 [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT Kuninori Morimoto
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-10-08 2:07 ` Simon Horman
@ 2013-10-08 2:57 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-10-08 4:00 ` Simon Horman
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kuninori Morimoto @ 2013-10-08 2:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sh
Hi Simon
> > > > > Kuninori Morimoto (7):
> > > > > 1) ARM: shmobile: bockw: enable CONFIG_REGULATOR
> > > > > 2) ARM: shmobile: bockw: use regulator for MMCIF
> > > > > 3) ARM: shmobile: bockw: add default PFC settings on DTS
> > > > > 4) ARM: shmobile: bockw: remove manual PFC settings on reference
> > > > > 5) ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add MMCIF clock support for DT
> > > > > 6) ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add MMCIF support on DTSI
> > > > > 7) ARM: shmobile: bockw: add MMCIF support on DTS
(snip)
> > "ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in DT"
> > is bugfix patch for DT.
> > The kernel (especially, pfc settings = #3) doesn't work
> > without it.
> > Is this explain enough for you ?
>
> Assuming that "ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in
> DT" is not applied. When the pfc settings don't work does the kernel still
> work as well as it did prior to patch #3 not being applied?
#1, #2 will works well without fixup patch.
#3 need it, and
#4-#7 need #3 patch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT
2013-10-04 1:28 [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT Kuninori Morimoto
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2013-10-08 2:57 ` Kuninori Morimoto
@ 2013-10-08 4:00 ` Simon Horman
2013-10-08 20:59 ` Laurent Pinchart
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2013-10-08 4:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sh
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 07:57:06PM -0700, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>
> Hi Simon
>
> > > > > > Kuninori Morimoto (7):
> > > > > > 1) ARM: shmobile: bockw: enable CONFIG_REGULATOR
> > > > > > 2) ARM: shmobile: bockw: use regulator for MMCIF
> > > > > > 3) ARM: shmobile: bockw: add default PFC settings on DTS
> > > > > > 4) ARM: shmobile: bockw: remove manual PFC settings on reference
> > > > > > 5) ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add MMCIF clock support for DT
> > > > > > 6) ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add MMCIF support on DTSI
> > > > > > 7) ARM: shmobile: bockw: add MMCIF support on DTS
> (snip)
> > > "ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in DT"
> > > is bugfix patch for DT.
> > > The kernel (especially, pfc settings = #3) doesn't work
> > > without it.
> > > Is this explain enough for you ?
> >
> > Assuming that "ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in
> > DT" is not applied. When the pfc settings don't work does the kernel still
> > work as well as it did prior to patch #3 not being applied?
>
> #1, #2 will works well without fixup patch.
I will see about queuing up #1 and #2 without further delay.
> #3 need it, and
> #4-#7 need #3 patch.
Thanks, I understand.
Laurent, could you let me know if you have a branch available
with "ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in DT".
If not I'm happy to wait.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT
2013-10-04 1:28 [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT Kuninori Morimoto
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2013-10-08 4:00 ` Simon Horman
@ 2013-10-08 20:59 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-10-09 0:11 ` Kuninori Morimoto
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2013-10-08 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sh
Hi Simon,
On Tuesday 08 October 2013 13:00:59 Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 07:57:06PM -0700, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> > Hi Simon
> >
> > > > > > > Kuninori Morimoto (7):
> > > > > > > 1) ARM: shmobile: bockw: enable CONFIG_REGULATOR
> > > > > > > 2) ARM: shmobile: bockw: use regulator for MMCIF
> > > > > > > 3) ARM: shmobile: bockw: add default PFC settings on DTS
> > > > > > > 4) ARM: shmobile: bockw: remove manual PFC settings on
> > > > > > > reference
> > > > > > > 5) ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add MMCIF clock support for DT
> > > > > > > 6) ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add MMCIF support on DTSI
> > > > > > > 7) ARM: shmobile: bockw: add MMCIF support on DTS
> >
> > (snip)
> >
> > > > "ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in DT" is
> > > > bugfix patch for DT. The kernel (especially, pfc settings = #3)
> > > > doesn't work without it. Is this explain enough for you ?
> > >
> > > Assuming that "ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in
> > > DT" is not applied. When the pfc settings don't work does the kernel
> > > still
> > > work as well as it did prior to patch #3 not being applied?
> >
> > #1, #2 will works well without fixup patch.
>
> I will see about queuing up #1 and #2 without further delay.
>
> > #3 need it, and
> > #4-#7 need #3 patch.
>
> Thanks, I understand.
>
> Laurent, could you let me know if you have a branch available with "ARM:
> shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in DT". If not I'm happy
> to wait.
I don't have one. The bug got introduced in v3.12-rc1, without any serious
consequence as the DT node wasn't used. The fix might even break the bockw-
reference board if Morimoto-san's patch 4 isn't applied, as the PFC device
seems to be registered twice then (I haven't tested this).
Morimoto-san, could you please test my fix on bockw-reference without your
patch series ? If it doesn't break anything then we could push it to v3.12.
Otherwise we can include it with this series. Simon, would that be fine with
you ?
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT
2013-10-04 1:28 [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT Kuninori Morimoto
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2013-10-08 20:59 ` Laurent Pinchart
@ 2013-10-09 0:11 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-10-09 20:20 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-10-10 11:33 ` Simon Horman
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kuninori Morimoto @ 2013-10-09 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sh
Hi Simon, Laurent
> > Laurent, could you let me know if you have a branch available with "ARM:
> > shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in DT". If not I'm happy
> > to wait.
>
> I don't have one. The bug got introduced in v3.12-rc1, without any serious
> consequence as the DT node wasn't used. The fix might even break the bockw-
> reference board if Morimoto-san's patch 4 isn't applied, as the PFC device
> seems to be registered twice then (I haven't tested this).
>
> Morimoto-san, could you please test my fix on bockw-reference without your
> patch series ? If it doesn't break anything then we could push it to v3.12.
> Otherwise we can include it with this series. Simon, would that be fine with
> you ?
I tested Laurent's fixup patch on
- latest linus/master + fixup patch
- renesas-devel-20131008 + fixup patch
both works well
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT
2013-10-04 1:28 [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT Kuninori Morimoto
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2013-10-09 0:11 ` Kuninori Morimoto
@ 2013-10-09 20:20 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-10-10 11:33 ` Simon Horman
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2013-10-09 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sh
Hi Morimoto-san and Simon,
On Tuesday 08 October 2013 17:11:10 Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> Hi Simon, Laurent
>
> > > Laurent, could you let me know if you have a branch available with "ARM:
> > > shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in DT". If not I'm
> > > happy
> > > to wait.
> >
> > I don't have one. The bug got introduced in v3.12-rc1, without any serious
> > consequence as the DT node wasn't used. The fix might even break the
> > bockw-
> > reference board if Morimoto-san's patch 4 isn't applied, as the PFC device
> > seems to be registered twice then (I haven't tested this).
> >
> > Morimoto-san, could you please test my fix on bockw-reference without your
> > patch series ? If it doesn't break anything then we could push it to
> > v3.12.
> > Otherwise we can include it with this series. Simon, would that be fine
> > with you ?
>
> I tested Laurent's fixup patch on
>
> - latest linus/master + fixup patch
> - renesas-devel-20131008 + fixup patch
>
> both works well
Thank you for testing this.
Simon, would you like to pick up the patch for v3.12 ?
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT
2013-10-04 1:28 [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT Kuninori Morimoto
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2013-10-09 20:20 ` Laurent Pinchart
@ 2013-10-10 11:33 ` Simon Horman
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2013-10-10 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sh
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 10:20:46PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Morimoto-san and Simon,
>
> On Tuesday 08 October 2013 17:11:10 Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> > Hi Simon, Laurent
> >
> > > > Laurent, could you let me know if you have a branch available with "ARM:
> > > > shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in DT". If not I'm
> > > > happy
> > > > to wait.
> > >
> > > I don't have one. The bug got introduced in v3.12-rc1, without any serious
> > > consequence as the DT node wasn't used. The fix might even break the
> > > bockw-
> > > reference board if Morimoto-san's patch 4 isn't applied, as the PFC device
> > > seems to be registered twice then (I haven't tested this).
> > >
> > > Morimoto-san, could you please test my fix on bockw-reference without your
> > > patch series ? If it doesn't break anything then we could push it to
> > > v3.12.
> > > Otherwise we can include it with this series. Simon, would that be fine
> > > with you ?
> >
> > I tested Laurent's fixup patch on
> >
> > - latest linus/master + fixup patch
> > - renesas-devel-20131008 + fixup patch
> >
> > both works well
>
> Thank you for testing this.
>
> Simon, would you like to pick up the patch for v3.12 ?
Hi Laurent, Hi Morimoto,
sorry for the confusion and delay.
Yes I can take that patch but as its not urgent I would prefer
to queue it up for v3.13 or at this stage more likely the distant v3.14.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-10-10 11:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-10-04 1:28 [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT Kuninori Morimoto
2013-10-04 1:30 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-10-04 1:35 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-10-08 1:11 ` Simon Horman
2013-10-08 1:32 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-10-08 2:07 ` Simon Horman
2013-10-08 2:57 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-10-08 4:00 ` Simon Horman
2013-10-08 20:59 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-10-09 0:11 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-10-09 20:20 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-10-10 11:33 ` Simon Horman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).