From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 04:00:59 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: bockw: MMCIF support on DT
Message-Id: <20131008040054.GA18335@verge.net.au>
List-Id: <linux-sh.vger.kernel.org>
References: <878uy9259u.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
In-Reply-To: <878uy9259u.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 07:57:06PM -0700, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> 
> Hi Simon
> 
> > > > > > Kuninori Morimoto (7):
> > > > > >       1) ARM: shmobile: bockw: enable CONFIG_REGULATOR
> > > > > >       2) ARM: shmobile: bockw: use regulator for MMCIF
> > > > > >       3) ARM: shmobile: bockw: add default PFC settings on DTS
> > > > > >       4) ARM: shmobile: bockw: remove manual PFC settings on reference
> > > > > >       5) ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add MMCIF clock support for DT
> > > > > >       6) ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add MMCIF support on DTSI
> > > > > >       7) ARM: shmobile: bockw: add MMCIF support on DTS
> (snip)
> > > "ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in DT" 
> > > is bugfix patch for DT.
> > > The kernel (especially, pfc settings = #3) doesn't work
> > > without it.
> > > Is this explain enough for you ?
> > 
> > Assuming that "ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in
> > DT" is not applied. When the pfc settings don't work does the kernel still
> > work as well as it did prior to patch #3 not being applied?
> 
> #1, #2 will works well without fixup patch.

I will see about queuing up #1 and #2 without further delay.

> #3 need it, and
> #4-#7 need #3 patch.

Thanks, I understand.

Laurent, could you let me know if you have a branch available
with "ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: Fix pin control device address in DT".
If not I'm happy to wait.