From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 06:09:04 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: add SDHI support on DTSI
Message-Id: <20131016060902.GC15425@verge.net.au>
List-Id: <linux-sh.vger.kernel.org>
References: <87d2nc1fi8.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
In-Reply-To: <87d2nc1fi8.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 06:07:31PM -0700, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> Hi Simon again
> 
> > > > "The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the
> > > > function of the device and not its precise programming model." So I
> > > > suggest using "mmc" or "sd" instead.
> > > > 
> > > > [1] http://www.power.org/resources/downloads/Power_ePAPR_APPROVED_v1.0.pdf
> > > 
> > > Morimoto-san,
> > > 
> > > would it be possible for you to either update this patch or provide a
> > > subsequent incremental to use "mmc" or "sd" as Sergei suggests. I have a
> > > slight preference for "mmc" but please use your own judgement.
> > > 
> > > If you could also provide patches to update existing dts/dtsi files
> > > that would be awesome.
> > 
> > I see.
> > But, we already have both SDHI and MMCIF now.
> > I guess below naming seems good.
> > 
> >  - SDHI  -> sd
> >  - MMCIF -> mmc
> > 
> > what do you think ?

Sounds good.

> And, I will send fixup patches for existing dts/dtsi.
> Then, can you accept these current r8a7778 patches as-is + naming fixup patch ?
> or do you want to me v2 patches for these ?

I'm happy to take your current patches as-is and then apply
naming fixes on top.