From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:28:47 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sata_rcar: Add R-Car Gen2 SATA PHY support Message-Id: <20131030002847.GL21262@verge.net.au> List-Id: References: <1381925161-16729-1-git-send-email-valentine.barshak@cogentembedded.com> <1381925161-16729-3-git-send-email-valentine.barshak@cogentembedded.com> <20131029045943.GE20432@verge.net.au> <20131029084444.GC15731@verge.net.au> <82E941A8-D062-4E90-B661-511881F51F9B@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <82E941A8-D062-4E90-B661-511881F51F9B@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Kumar Gala Cc: Valentine Barshak , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm , Vladimir Barinov , Sergei Shtylyov , Kuninori Morimoto , Laurent Pinchart , Guennadi Liakhovetski , Tejun Heo , Mark Rutland On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:19:08PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Oct 29, 2013, at 3:44 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 03:24:16AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > >> > >> On Oct 28, 2013, at 11:59 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 04:06:01PM +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote: > >>>> R-Car Gen2 SoCs have a different PHY which is not compatible > >>>> with the older R-Car H1 (R8A7779) version. > >>>> This adds OF/platform device id tables and PHY initialization > >>>> callbacks for the following Gen2 SoCs: > >>>> * R-Car H2: R8A7790; > >>>> * R-Car M2: R8A7791. > >>>> > >>>> PHY initialization method is chosen based on the device id. > >>>> Default PHY settings are applied for Gen2 SoCs, which should > >>>> suit the Gen2 boards available. > >>>> > >>>> The R8A7779 platform code is modified to use "sata-r8a7779" > >>>> device name. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Valentine Barshak > >>>> --- > >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/ata/sata_rcar.txt | 5 +- > >>>> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a7779.c | 2 +- > >>>> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7779.c | 2 +- > >>>> drivers/ata/sata_rcar.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++--- > >>> > >>> Hi Mark, Hi Device-Tree Folks, > >>> > >>> I'm wondering if you have had a chance to look over the bindings > >>> aspect of this and the other patch in the series. I believe that > >>> this series addresses all previous review in that regards. > >> > >> What tree is this binding in? > > > > sata_car.txt is added by the previous patch in this series > > "[PATCH 1/2] sata_rcar: Adjust and document device tree bindings" > > Why not just have all the binding in one patch. There isn't a reason this should be split. I think that the motivation was that the first patch documents the existing implementation while the second documents a change to it. With that in mind would you still like a single patch for the binding?