SUPERH platform development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: koelsch: Conditionally select MICREL_PHY
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:04:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131219090420.GD12239@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131218005326.GE18992@verge.net.au>

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 09:53:26AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:10:15AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 02:31:35AM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > >> On 12/16/2013 04:25 PM, I wrote:
> > >> >>The koelsch board uses has an SH ethernet controller which uses a Micrel
> > >> >>phy. Select MICREL_PHY for koelsch if SH_ETH is enabled to make use of the
> > >> >>Micrel-specific phy driver rather than relying on the generic phy driver.
> > >>
> > >> >    Frankly speaking, I'm seeing no advantages to doing that.
> > >>
> > >>    Although wait, Geert has reported the absence of Rx FIFO overflow
> > >> messages with this PHY driver, IIRC.
> > 
> > I spoke too soon: apparently the statistical relevance of my reporting was
> > too low. I still see them from time to time, but I think less than before (no
> > numbers available).
> > 
> > >> >>Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
> > >>
> > >> >    Analogous changes are needed for BOCK-W and Lager boards since they all
> > >> >use the same KSZ8041RNLI PHY chip. I was going to submit such changes with the
> > >> >PHY IRQ patches but since no IRQ is generated still, this got delayed...
> > >>
> > >>    Only I was going to do it via defconfigs...
> > >
> > > That was my initial approach too. However I have been convinced
> > > that Kconfig is a better way forwards.
> > 
> > Kconfig has the advantage that the minimal defconfigs will be smaller, so
> > less churn there.
> > However, it does mean you cannot disable the option anymore via your .config.
> > 
> > In this case it's a bit difficult to decide, as sh_eth will work both
> > with and without
> > the specific PHY-driver.
> > 
> > If no users want to disable it, I'd go for Kconfig.
> 
> It is indeed a tricky choice. But I think we should try going for Kconfig.

I have decided to queue this up.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-19  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-16  0:31 [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: koelsch: Conditionally select MICREL_PHY Simon Horman
2013-12-16 13:25 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-12-16 22:31   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-12-17  0:31     ` Simon Horman
2013-12-17 10:10       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-12-18  0:53         ` Simon Horman
2013-12-19  9:04           ` Simon Horman [this message]
2013-12-17  0:30   ` Simon Horman
2013-12-19 22:05 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-12-26  5:30   ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131219090420.GD12239@verge.net.au \
    --to=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox