Re: [PATCH 0/9] setting the table for integration of cpuidle with the scheduler

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 01:08:15AM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> As everyone should know by now, we want to integrate the cpuidle
> governor with the scheduler for a more efficient idling of CPUs.
> In order to help the transition, this small patch series moves the
> existing interaction with cpuidle from architecture code to generic
> core code.  No functional change should have occurred yet.
> 
> The ARM, PPC, SH and X86 architectures are concerned.  Small cleanups
> to ARM and ARM64 are also included. I don't know yet the best path for
> those patches to get into mainline, but it is probably best if they
> stay together. So ACKs from architecture maintainers would be greatly
> appreciated.
> 
> 
>  arch/arm/kernel/process.c                       | 21 +++---------
>  arch/arm/kernel/setup.c                         |  7 ++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/process.c                     |  5 ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c                       |  7 ++++
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c |  5 +++
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c          | 34 ++++++++-----------
>  arch/sh/kernel/idle.c                           |  4 +--
>  arch/x86/kernel/process.c                       |  5 +--
>  include/linux/cpu.h                             |  1 -
>  kernel/Makefile                                 |  1 -
>  kernel/cpu/Makefile                             |  1 -
>  kernel/sched/Makefile                           |  2 +-
>  kernel/{cpu => sched}/idle.c                    |  6 ++--
>  13 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

Thomas, any objections to this? It looks like a sensible thing to do.