From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:16:23 +0000 Subject: Re: mmc: sh_mobile_sdhi: DT update for R-Car Message-Id: <20140131001621.GG14663@verge.net.au> List-Id: References: <87lhy090m0.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com> <87y51yghc9.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com> <20140130064350.GA1449@verge.net.au> <87vbx2gd6a.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87vbx2gd6a.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Kuninori Morimoto Cc: Chris Ball , Magnus , Linux-SH , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:08:00PM -0800, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > Hi Simon, Chris > > > Previously I was somewhat ambivalent to this but experience has shown me > > that taking shmobile patches through my tree is best. The reason is that it > > reduces (eliminates?) merge conflicts. Conflicts that have to be resolved by > > third parties, such as Linus. And we want to make the lives of those people > > as easy as possible. > > > > So please make sure that the patches are split up such that there are > > patches for the driver and patches for shmobile. Ideally post them in > > separate series but if you prefer they can go in a single series. But > > regardless please note that the driver patches are for the driver > > maintainer to pick up and the shmobile patches are for me. > > Thank you ! > OK, I will do my best > > I would like to get Chris's review > before sending v2 patch if possible. That is fine by me :)