[Announce] Renesas branches rebased on v3.10-rc2

[Announce] Renesas branches rebased on v3.10-rc2

[Simon Horman]

Hi,

I have rebased all branches of the renesas tree that are targeted
at v3.11 on top of v3.10-rc2. I have also merged these into
a new next branch which I have pushed and tagged as renesas-next-20130523.
This should appear in linux-next in the not to distant future.

There are a few -fixes branches which resolve problems in v3.10-rc1. I will
get pull requests to arm-soc for those branches in the not to distant
future. The target for -fixes branches is v3.10.

As this took a while I am a little behind with picking up patches that
have been posted, but I hope to catch up over the next few days.

Moving forwards, assuming that nothing dramatic happens I will start
sending pull requests to arm-soc for the non-fixes branches so they
can be included in v3.11. At this stage I plan to start doing that
next week.

Known problems: Booting marzen-reference seems flakey and I'm entirely
unsure why.

[ANNOUNCE] Renesas branches rebased on v3.14-rc1

[Simon Horman]

Hi,

I have rebased the branched that include patches queued up for v3.15.  The
new base is v3.14-rc1. I also have created new devel and next branches
accordingly.

Now would be a great time to consider resending patches targeted at the
renesas tree which have dependencies provided by v3.14-rc1.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Renesas branches rebased on v3.14-rc1

[Ben Dooks]

On 04/02/14 06:52, Simon Horman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have rebased the branched that include patches queued up for v3.15.  The
> new base is v3.14-rc1. I also have created new devel and next branches
> accordingly.
>
> Now would be a great time to consider resending patches targeted at the
> renesas tree which have dependencies provided by v3.14-rc1.

Should I re-base and re-send items that did not make it from the last
development cycle?

-- 
Ben Dooks				http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer				Codethink - Providing Genius

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Renesas branches rebased on v3.14-rc1

[Simon Horman]

On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 09:10:13AM +0000, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On 04/02/14 06:52, Simon Horman wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I have rebased the branched that include patches queued up for v3.15.  The
> >new base is v3.14-rc1. I also have created new devel and next branches
> >accordingly.
> >
> >Now would be a great time to consider resending patches targeted at the
> >renesas tree which have dependencies provided by v3.14-rc1.
> 
> Should I re-base and re-send items that did not make it from the last
> development cycle?

Yes, please do.