From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/03] ARM: shmobile: Remove KZM9D board code
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:44:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140217014427.GA25228@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANqRtoRrm12Fb1gxHKCSi=MzywvdcoPPpCESsff6BofPwuSvCw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:36:25AM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > Hi Magnus,
> >
> > I'm not clear on the motivation for removing emev2_smp_ops from
> > emev2.h only to have to add it as an extern to setup-emev2.c.
> > But if thats how you like to roll then I have no objections.
>
> Hehe, I suppose I felt a sudden urge to remove that particular header file.
>
> > However, what I would like to ask is that the emev2.h shuffling,
> > that is the changes to emev2.h, setup-emev2.c and smp-emev2.c
> > could be moved into a follow-up patch that I will queue up at a later date.
>
> That's fine.
>
> > The reason is that these really seem to be SoC changes but
> > the main portion of this patch is a board change. And as you
> > know the arm-soc people like soc and board changes split into
> > different branches.
>
> Sure. Would you like me to redo 2/3 to break out the header file bits?
Ideally, yes.
Alternatively, I can just drop them from 2/3 and you can send
a follow-up patch at a later date.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-17 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-13 8:25 [PATCH 00/03] ARM: shmobile: Clean up the EMEV2 and KZM9D code base Magnus Damm
2014-02-13 8:26 ` [PATCH 01/03] ARM: shmobile: Remove legacy EMEV2 SoC support Magnus Damm
2014-02-17 3:23 ` Simon Horman
2014-02-18 4:16 ` Simon Horman
2014-02-18 4:25 ` Magnus Damm
2014-03-07 2:38 ` Simon Horman
2014-02-13 8:26 ` [PATCH 02/03] ARM: shmobile: Remove KZM9D board code Magnus Damm
2014-02-17 0:02 ` Simon Horman
2014-02-17 1:36 ` Magnus Damm
2014-02-17 1:44 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2014-02-13 8:26 ` [PATCH 03/03] ARM: shmobile: Get rid of legacy KZM9D defconfig Magnus Damm
2014-02-17 3:23 ` Simon Horman
2014-06-05 5:32 ` [PATCH 03/03] ARM: shmobile: Get rid of redundant EMEV2 mach callbacks Magnus Damm
2014-06-05 8:13 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-06-05 21:40 ` Magnus Damm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140217014427.GA25228@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).