SUPERH platform development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 51/97] ARM: l2c: remove platforms/SoCs setting early BRESP
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 06:13:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140430061315.GA5153@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <535FD07D.5070801@wwwdotorg.org>

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:17:01AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 04/28/2014 06:02 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 08:30:32PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> >> Since we now automatically enable early BRESP in core L2C-310 code when
> >> we detect a Cortex-A9, we don't need platforms/SoCs to set this bit
> >> explicitly.  Instead, they should seek to preserve the value of bit 30
> >> in the auxiliary control register.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > 
> > I would prefer if this patch was broken out into individual patches
> > for each board or SoC file and that they were then picked up
> > by their respective platform maintainers.
> > 
> > Likewise for patch 66/97. Although it is only for shmobile
> > I would prefer it broken out.
> 
> There are far too many dependencies in this series to break out the
> board file patches to be merged separately; it'd take either a whole
> bunch of kernel releases to merge it all that way, or a twisty maze of
> tiny topic branches cross-merged all over the place. Neither option is
> realistic.

Understood, that seems reasonable to me.

For the shmobile portions this patch and 66/97.

Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>


  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-30  6:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20140428192419.GV26756@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
2014-04-28 19:30 ` [PATCH 51/97] ARM: l2c: remove platforms/SoCs setting early BRESP Russell King
2014-04-28 20:04   ` Stephen Warren
2014-04-29  0:02   ` Simon Horman
2014-04-29  0:21     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-05-01 15:12       ` Grant Likely
2014-05-01 16:18         ` Jon Loeliger
2014-05-03 21:37         ` Olof Johansson
2014-04-29 16:17     ` Stephen Warren
2014-04-30  6:13       ` Simon Horman [this message]
2014-04-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 66/97] ARM: l2c: shmobile: remove cache size override Russell King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140430061315.GA5153@verge.net.au \
    --to=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox