From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 23:04:40 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ARM: shmobile: Enable CPU FREQ support
Message-Id: <20140529230438.GA2353@verge.net.au>
List-Id: <linux-sh.vger.kernel.org>
References: <5386E64B.7060202@bp.renesas.com>
In-Reply-To: <5386E64B.7060202@bp.renesas.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 01:09:17AM -0700, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> 
> Hi Inami-san
> 
> > Benoit Cousson (2):
> >   ARM: dts: r8a7790-lager: Add DVFS parameters into cpu0 node for
> >     r8a7790
> >   ARM: shmobile: Make r8a77900 CPUFreq capable
> 
> According to this, [1/7] [2/7] patches were
> created by Benoit ?
> 
> Maybe you want to add extra "From" to these patches,
> and I guess you want to add your Signed-off-by also ?
> Otherwise, patch author will be you instead of Benoit
> 
> like this ?
> 
> -----------------------
>     From: Gaku Inami <gaku.inami.xw@bp.renesas.com>
>     Subject: [PATCH 2/7] ARM: shmobile: Make r8a77900 CPUFreq capable
> 
> =>  From: Benoit Cousson <bcousson@baylibre.com>
> 
>     Mark r8a77900 platform as CPUFreq capable
>     on multiplatform build only.
> 
> =>  Signed-off-by: Gaku Inami <gaku.inami.xw@bp.renesas.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <bcousson@baylibre.com>

If Benoit Cousson wrote the patch and Inami-san is passing it on
(with or without modifications) then I think the Signed-off-by lines
should be the other way around.

    Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <bcousson@baylibre.com>
=>  Signed-off-by: Gaku Inami <gaku.inami.xw@bp.renesas.com>


Also, I think it would be sane tough not essential to CC Benoit Cousson
when reposting the patches.

>     ---
>     ...
>