From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:42:45 +0000 Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Fourth Round of Renesas ARM Based SoC Clock Updates for v3.17 Message-Id: <20140731004244.GA31873@verge.net.au> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:35:51PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Simon Horman > wrote: > > Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd, > > > > Please consider these fourth round of Renesas ARM based SoC clock > > updates for v3.17. > > > > I am sending this even though v3.16-rc6 has long since been released > > as this pull-request only includes a single one line fix for a problem > > introduced in patches you have already queued up for v3.16. > > > > At it turns out the problem should not manifest at run time > > as it is an error in an clock that is not used without DT modifications. > > As such I am happy for you to ask me to defer this to v3.18 if you like. > > > > This pull request is based on the previous round of > > such requests, tagged as renesas-clock3-for-v3.17, > > which you have already merged. > > It is less work to just apply a patch when there's a single one like > this. Please just send it and ask us to apply it on top of the > previous branch. Thanks, I wasn't aware of that. The patch was sent as a reply to this email, though you were not CCed on the patch email. I will repost it with you CCed.