linux-sh.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] i2c: rcar: remove spinlock
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 03:08:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140823030849.GA1305@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53F7D83A.5030903@cogentembedded.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 701 bytes --]


> >The i2c core has per-adapter locks, so no need to protect again.
> 
>    The core's lock is unable to protect from the IRQs. So I'm proposing to
> revert this patch. It's a pity I hadn't noticed this issue when the patch
> was posted.

Yes, you are right. I noticed a while ago, too, but then got
side-tracked :(

>    I'm afraid this unlock is misplaced, the code continues to access the
> registers.
> 
> >  	ret = rcar_i2c_bus_barrier(priv);
> 
>    Should probably unlock here instead?

I can check details next week earliest. If you are confident with your
suggestions, feel free to send one patch with the revert and the updates
you mentioned.

Thanks,

   Wolfram


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-23  3:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-28  7:44 [PATCH 00/11] i2c: rcar: cleanup series Wolfram Sang
2014-05-28  7:44 ` [PATCH 01/11] i2c: rcar: not everything needs to be a function Wolfram Sang
2014-05-28  7:44 ` [PATCH 02/11] i2c: rcar: no need to store irq number Wolfram Sang
2014-05-28  7:44 ` [PATCH 04/11] i2c: rcar: refactor irq state machine Wolfram Sang
2014-05-28  7:44 ` [PATCH 05/11] i2c: rcar: check bus free before first message Wolfram Sang
     [not found] ` <1401263086-13720-1-git-send-email-wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-28  7:44   ` [PATCH 03/11] i2c: rcar: refactor bus state machine Wolfram Sang
2014-05-28  7:44   ` [PATCH 06/11] i2c: rcar: refactor setting up msg Wolfram Sang
2014-05-28  8:26   ` [PATCH 00/11] i2c: rcar: cleanup series Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-05-28  7:44 ` [PATCH 07/11] i2c: rcar: refactor status bit handling Wolfram Sang
2014-05-28  7:44 ` [PATCH 08/11] i2c: rcar: remove spinlock Wolfram Sang
2014-08-22 23:54   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-08-23  3:08     ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2014-09-02 22:10     ` Sergei Shtylyov
     [not found]       ` <5406404A.7090509-M4DtvfQ/ZS1MRgGoP+s0PdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-02 22:18         ` Wolfram Sang
2014-05-28  7:44 ` [PATCH 09/11] i2c: rcar: reuse status bits as enable bits Wolfram Sang
2014-05-28  7:44 ` [PATCH 10/11] i2c: rcar: janitorial cleanup after refactoring Wolfram Sang
2014-05-28  7:44 ` [PATCH 11/11] i2c: rcar: update copyright and license information Wolfram Sang
2014-05-28  8:11 ` [PATCH 00/11] i2c: rcar: cleanup series Kuninori Morimoto
2014-06-01 20:24 ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140823030849.GA1305@katana \
    --to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).