From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Armadillo800EVA legacy defconfig seems busted on my board
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 08:08:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140827080831.GC5936@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANqRtoQ2Epyhtu2yKCHJMG5VXjiOo6eWNFDTNtzwPEEtNnw8qg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 08:39:16AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Simon, Magnus,
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> >> > Working fine here with both a 100 Mbps or a Gbps switch.
> >> > Gether is supposed to be gigabit, but I only get 100 Mbps.
> >> > Ethtool tells me only 10 or 100 Mbps are available?
> >> >
> >> > What kind of switch do you need? What doesn't work?
> >>
> >> A shitty semi-managed Netgear Gigabit switch in Autonegotiation does
> >> not work, however switching to a different unmanaged Netgear Gigabit
> >> switch makes it work. So now i have a 5-port Gigabit switch hooked up
> >> in between.
> >>
> >> I suspect it to be some issue related to PHY settings in the boot loader.
> >
> > That would not surprise me.
> >
> > I noticed that I had to turn off spanning tree on the switch my Armadillo is
> > connected to else link negotiation would timeout before spanning tree
> > completed and thus the link would never come up. This was not a particularly
> > crappy switch and my personal view is that the Ethernet situation on the
> > boot loader on my Armadillo is less than ideal.
>
> Does it link at Gigabit speed (under Linux), or only 100 Mbps?
100Mbps.
IIRC this is a hardware limitation of the board. Perhaps the PHY.
But I only have a very vague memory of a conversation about that.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-27 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-08 11:26 Armadillo800EVA legacy defconfig seems busted on my board Magnus Damm
2014-08-08 13:02 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-08-11 0:42 ` Simon Horman
2014-08-26 11:00 ` Magnus Damm
2014-08-26 16:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-08-27 6:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-08-27 8:08 ` Simon Horman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140827080831.GC5936@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).