From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov-M4DtvfQ/ZS1MRgGoP+s0PdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Simon Horman <horms-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org>,
Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org>,
Kuninori Morimoto
<kuninori.morimoto.gx-zM6kxYcvzFBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] i2c: rcar: remove spinlock
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 22:18:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140902221858.GA1267@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5406404A.7090509-M4DtvfQ/ZS1MRgGoP+s0PdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 389 bytes --]
> After looking at the code, it looks like it was a false alarm on my side.
> The I2C interrupts are disabled here and other threads should be locked out
> by the I2C core locks. So it doesn't make sense to hold IRQs disabled during
> a possibly long polling loop in rcar_i2c_bus_barrier(). So I'll just repost
> the revert patch (if still needed).
Nope. Thanks for looking into it.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-02 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-28 7:44 [PATCH 00/11] i2c: rcar: cleanup series Wolfram Sang
2014-05-28 7:44 ` [PATCH 01/11] i2c: rcar: not everything needs to be a function Wolfram Sang
2014-05-28 7:44 ` [PATCH 02/11] i2c: rcar: no need to store irq number Wolfram Sang
2014-05-28 7:44 ` [PATCH 04/11] i2c: rcar: refactor irq state machine Wolfram Sang
2014-05-28 7:44 ` [PATCH 05/11] i2c: rcar: check bus free before first message Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <1401263086-13720-1-git-send-email-wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-28 7:44 ` [PATCH 03/11] i2c: rcar: refactor bus state machine Wolfram Sang
2014-05-28 7:44 ` [PATCH 06/11] i2c: rcar: refactor setting up msg Wolfram Sang
2014-05-28 8:26 ` [PATCH 00/11] i2c: rcar: cleanup series Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-05-28 7:44 ` [PATCH 07/11] i2c: rcar: refactor status bit handling Wolfram Sang
2014-05-28 7:44 ` [PATCH 08/11] i2c: rcar: remove spinlock Wolfram Sang
2014-08-22 23:54 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-08-23 3:08 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-09-02 22:10 ` Sergei Shtylyov
[not found] ` <5406404A.7090509-M4DtvfQ/ZS1MRgGoP+s0PdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-02 22:18 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2014-05-28 7:44 ` [PATCH 09/11] i2c: rcar: reuse status bits as enable bits Wolfram Sang
2014-05-28 7:44 ` [PATCH 10/11] i2c: rcar: janitorial cleanup after refactoring Wolfram Sang
2014-05-28 7:44 ` [PATCH 11/11] i2c: rcar: update copyright and license information Wolfram Sang
2014-05-28 8:11 ` [PATCH 00/11] i2c: rcar: cleanup series Kuninori Morimoto
2014-06-01 20:24 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140902221858.GA1267@katana \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=horms-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx-zM6kxYcvzFBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=magnus.damm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov-M4DtvfQ/ZS1MRgGoP+s0PdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).