From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 00:22:16 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] ARM: shmobile: Remove sh7372/Mackerel and ZBOOT MMC/SDHI support Message-Id: <20150126002215.GB4477@verge.net.au> List-Id: References: <20150121045256.7648.7451.sendpatchset@little-apple> In-Reply-To: <20150121045256.7648.7451.sendpatchset@little-apple> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 01:52:56PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > ARM: shmobile: Remove sh7372/Mackerel and ZBOOT MMC/SDHI support > > [PATCH 01/13] ARM: shmobile: mackerel: Remove ZBOOT code > [PATCH 02/13] ARM: shmobile: mackerel: Remove Legacy C board code > [PATCH 03/13] ARM: shmobile: mackerel dts: Remove Legacy DTS file > [PATCH 04/13] ARM: shmobile: mackerel: Remove DT binding documentation > [PATCH 05/13] ARM: shmobile: mackerel: Remove mach-type entry > [PATCH 06/13] ARM: shmobile: mackerel: Remove defconfig > [PATCH 07/13] ARM: shmobile: sh7372: Remove ZBOOT MMC/SDHI support > [PATCH 08/13] ARM: shmobile: sh7372: Remove Legacy C SoC code > [PATCH 09/13] ARM: shmobile: sh7372: Remove DT binding documentation > [PATCH 10/13] ARM: shmobile: sh7372 dtsi: Remove Legacy DTSI file > [PATCH 11/13] Documentation: Remove ZBOOT MMC/SDHI utility and docs > [PATCH 12/13] pinctrl: sh-pfc: sh7372: Remove PFC support > [PATCH 13/13] pinctrl: sh-pfc: sh7372: Remove DT binding documentation > > Remove legacy board and SoC support for Mackerel and sh7372. Both the > ARM mach-shmobile code base and the PINCTRL subsystem is affected. > > Also get rid of the remaining ZBOOT MMC/SDHI code, documentation and > utility that has no user once sh7372 is gone. > > The Cortex-A8 based sh7372 SoC is rather old and never went into mass > production anyway, so these patches that remove SoC and board support > will only affect a few selected developers. > > I wish we had some way to make use of the ZBOOT MMC/SDHI code, but > without any board or SoC code it makes little sense to keep it. > > Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm Hi Magnus, thanks for putting this together. There seem to have been few comments made on it. Could you consider respinning accordingly?